H1B Report
Side-by-side comparison

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP vs Regents of the University of Minnesota

A direct H-1B sponsorship comparison built from the same DOL Labor Condition Application data that drives every page on H1B Report. Total filings, outcome rates, top occupations and yearly demand side-by-side.

Entity A
Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
NJRank #5FEIN 34-6565596
Entity B
Regents of the University of Minnesota
MNRank #FEIN 41-6007513

Key metrics

All percentages are share of total LCAs filed by each sponsor.

MetricErnst & Young U.S. LLPRegents of the University of Minnesota
Total filings23,247551
Certified %94.86%76.23%
Denied %0.11%0.18%
Withdrawn %2.77%3.63%
Cert-withdrawn %2.25%19.96%
Rank#5
Active yearsFY2020–FY2025FY2023–FY2025
Worksite stateNJMN

Outcomes — Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

DOL case-status mix.

Certified94.9%
Cert-withdrawn2.3%
Withdrawn2.8%
Denied0.1%

Outcomes — Regents of the University of Minnesota

DOL case-status mix.

Certified76.2%
Cert-withdrawn20.0%
Withdrawn3.6%
Denied0.2%

Yearly filing volume

Year-over-year H-1B demand for each sponsor.

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
Regents of the University of Minnesota

Top 5 occupations — Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

Swap an entity
Replace either sponsor above without losing the comparison. 2-way for now; 3+ comparison coming soon.