Side-by-side comparison

Google LLC vs Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

A direct H-1B sponsorship comparison built from the same DOL Labor Condition Application data that drives every page on H1B Report. Total filings, outcome rates, top occupations and yearly demand side-by-side.

Summary

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP (New Jersey) and Google LLC (California) are both major H-1B sponsors. Between 2020 and 2025, Google filed 26,107 LCAs compared to Ernst & Young's 23,247—a difference of 2,860 filings. Google leads on volume, while Ernst & Young focuses on fewer but highly targeted sponsorships.

On certification rates, Google's applications achieved a 97.15% certification rate versus Ernst & Young's 94.86%, a meaningful 2.29-point advantage. Denial rates were low for both, with Google at 0.21% and Ernst & Young at 0.11%, suggesting both maintain strong application quality. Ernst & Young's slightly higher certification rate relative to denials indicates robust compliance, while Google's higher volume and approval rate reflects its scale in H-1B sponsorship.

Choosing between them depends on priorities: Google offers greater filing volume and approval certainty, while Ernst & Young demonstrates consistent, selective sponsorship practices.

Ernst & Young vs Google H-1B
H-1B filing comparison
Ernst & Young H-1B approvals
Google H-1B sponsorship
H-1B certification rates

Entity A

Google LLC

CARank #4FEIN 77-0493581

Entity B

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

NJRank #5FEIN 34-6565596

Key metrics

All percentages are share of total LCAs filed by each sponsor.

Metric	Google LLC	Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
Total filings	26,107▲	23,247
Certified %	97.15%▲	94.86%
Denied %	0.21%	0.11%▲
Withdrawn %	1.39%	2.77%
Cert-withdrawn %	1.26%	2.25%
Rank	#4▲	#5
Active years	FY2020–FY2025	FY2020–FY2025
Worksite state	CA	NJ