H1B Report
Side-by-side comparison

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP vs Archer Daniels Midland Company

A direct H-1B sponsorship comparison built from the same DOL Labor Condition Application data that drives every page on H1B Report. Total filings, outcome rates, top occupations and yearly demand side-by-side.

Entity A
Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
NJRank #5FEIN 34-6565596
Entity B
Archer Daniels Midland Company
ILRank #FEIN 41-0129150

Key metrics

All percentages are share of total LCAs filed by each sponsor.

MetricErnst & Young U.S. LLPArcher Daniels Midland Company
Total filings23,247275
Certified %94.86%94.55%
Denied %0.11%0.36%
Withdrawn %2.77%3.27%
Cert-withdrawn %2.25%1.82%
Rank#5
Active yearsFY2020–FY2025FY2020–FY2025
Worksite stateNJIL

Outcomes — Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

DOL case-status mix.

Certified94.9%
Cert-withdrawn2.3%
Withdrawn2.8%
Denied0.1%

Outcomes — Archer Daniels Midland Company

DOL case-status mix.

Certified94.6%
Cert-withdrawn1.8%
Withdrawn3.3%
Denied0.4%

Yearly filing volume

Year-over-year H-1B demand for each sponsor.

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
Archer Daniels Midland Company

Top 5 occupations — Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

Top 5 occupations — Archer Daniels Midland Company

Swap an entity
Replace either sponsor above without losing the comparison. 2-way for now; 3+ comparison coming soon.