Side-by-side comparison

Meta Platforms, Inc vs Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

A direct H-1B sponsorship comparison built from the same DOL Labor Condition Application data that drives every page on H1B Report. Total filings, outcome rates, top occupations and yearly demand side-by-side.

Summary

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP (New Jersey) and Meta Platforms, Inc (California) are both significant H-1B sponsors, but differ notably in scale and approval rates.

Ernst & Young leads substantially on filing volume with 23,247 petitions from 2020–2025, compared to Meta's 14,579 filings from 2022–2025. Ernst & Young's 94.86% certification rate reflects the larger, more diverse cohort typical of a global consulting firm. Meta achieves a higher certification rate of 98.35%, consistent with a more specialized tech employer.

Both sponsors maintain low denial rates (Ernst & Young at 0.11%, Meta at 0.12%), indicating strong compliance with prevailing wage and H-1B requirements. The comparison highlights how filing volume and approval rates vary by employer size, industry focus, and recruitment strategy.

Ernst & Young H-1B filings
Meta Platforms H-1B sponsorship
H-1B approval rates comparison
Ernst & Young vs Meta
H-1B certified petitions
tech company H-1B comparison

Entity A

Meta Platforms, Inc

CARank #8FEIN 20-1665019

Entity B

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

NJRank #5FEIN 34-6565596

Key metrics

All percentages are share of total LCAs filed by each sponsor.

Metric	Meta Platforms, Inc	Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
Total filings	14,579	23,247▲
Certified %	98.35%▲	94.86%
Denied %	0.12%	0.11%▲
Withdrawn %	0.19%	2.77%
Cert-withdrawn %	1.34%	2.25%
Rank	#8	#5▲
Active years	FY2022–FY2025	FY2020–FY2025
Worksite state	CA	NJ