H1B Report
Side-by-side comparison

Regents of the University of Minnesota vs Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

A direct H-1B sponsorship comparison built from the same DOL Labor Condition Application data that drives every page on H1B Report. Total filings, outcome rates, top occupations and yearly demand side-by-side.

Entity A
Regents of the University of Minnesota
MNRank #FEIN 41-6007513
Entity B
Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
NJRank #5FEIN 34-6565596

Key metrics

All percentages are share of total LCAs filed by each sponsor.

MetricRegents of the University of MinnesotaErnst & Young U.S. LLP
Total filings55123,247
Certified %76.23%94.86%
Denied %0.18%0.11%
Withdrawn %3.63%2.77%
Cert-withdrawn %19.96%2.25%
Rank#5
Active yearsFY2023–FY2025FY2020–FY2025
Worksite stateMNNJ

Outcomes — Regents of the University of Minnesota

DOL case-status mix.

Certified76.2%
Cert-withdrawn20.0%
Withdrawn3.6%
Denied0.2%

Outcomes — Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

DOL case-status mix.

Certified94.9%
Cert-withdrawn2.3%
Withdrawn2.8%
Denied0.1%

Yearly filing volume

Year-over-year H-1B demand for each sponsor.

Regents of the University of Minnesota
Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

Top 5 occupations — Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

Swap an entity
Replace either sponsor above without losing the comparison. 2-way for now; 3+ comparison coming soon.