Side-by-side comparison

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP vs Meta Platforms, Inc

A direct H-1B sponsorship comparison built from the same DOL Labor Condition Application data that drives every page on H1B Report. Total filings, outcome rates, top occupations and yearly demand side-by-side.

Summary

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP (New Jersey) and Meta Platforms, Inc (California) are both significant H-1B sponsors, but differ notably in scale and approval rates.

Ernst & Young leads substantially on filing volume with 23,247 petitions from 2020–2025, compared to Meta's 14,579 filings from 2022–2025. Ernst & Young's 94.86% certification rate reflects the larger, more diverse cohort typical of a global consulting firm. Meta achieves a higher certification rate of 98.35%, consistent with a more specialized tech employer.

Both sponsors maintain low denial rates (Ernst & Young at 0.11%, Meta at 0.12%), indicating strong compliance with prevailing wage and H-1B requirements. The comparison highlights how filing volume and approval rates vary by employer size, industry focus, and recruitment strategy.

Ernst & Young H-1B filings
Meta Platforms H-1B sponsorship
H-1B approval rates comparison
Ernst & Young vs Meta
H-1B certified petitions
tech company H-1B comparison

Entity A

Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

NJRank #5FEIN 34-6565596

Entity B

Meta Platforms, Inc

CARank #8FEIN 20-1665019

Key metrics

All percentages are share of total LCAs filed by each sponsor.

Metric	Ernst & Young U.S. LLP	Meta Platforms, Inc
Total filings	23,247▲	14,579
Certified %	94.86%	98.35%▲
Denied %	0.11%▲	0.12%
Withdrawn %	2.77%	0.19%
Cert-withdrawn %	2.25%	1.34%
Rank	#5▲	#8
Active years	FY2020–FY2025	FY2022–FY2025
Worksite state	NJ	CA