H-1B Sponsors for Engineers, All Other
43 employers filed 2,701 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Engineers, All Other across the US between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 43all listed below
- Filings
- 2,70113% of all 20,090 for this role
- Certified
- 88.2%
- Median wage
- $92,000across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 2,701 of the 20,090 total shown on the Engineers occupation page (13%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
This employer filed at least one WARN Act notice in the last 24 months — a state-mandated advance announcement of a planned mass layoff or closure. A notice is an announcement, not a completed layoff, and it is not evidence of any link between the employer’s H-1B filings and its workforce plans.
Showing 43 of 43 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tesla, Inc. | 419 | 91.6% | $132,300 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 6%, Level II: 39%, Level III: 38%, Level IV: 18% | |
| 2 | LHP Software LLC slast filed FY2019 | 157 | 91.7% | $66,960 | — | |
| 3 | ASML US, LP | 137 | 97.1% | $127,171 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 1%, Level II: 44%, Level III: 50%, Level IV: 5% | |
| 4 | SERVOTECH INC. | 115 | 76.5% | $62,400 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 36%, Level II: 50%, Level III: 14% | |
| 5 | Apple Inc. | 111 | 93.7% | $150,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 3%, Level II: 13%, Level III: 42%, Level IV: 42% | |
| 6 | Cummins Inc. | 104 | 76.0% | $63,107 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 17%, Level II: 83% | |
| 7 | General Motors | 100 | 99.0% | $112,573 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 27%, Level III: 27%, Level IV: 46% | |
| 8 | WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. | 95 | 94.7% | $130,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 4%, Level II: 22%, Level III: 71%, Level IV: 3% | |
| 9 | RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, LLC | 93 | 92.5% | $120,987 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 8%, Level II: 18%, Level III: 72%, Level IV: 2% | |
| 10 | FORD MOTOR COMPANY | 73 | 97.3% | $109,980 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 27%, Level II: 41%, Level III: 6%, Level IV: 25% | |
| 11 | Honeywell International, Inc.last filed FY2019 | 73 | 95.9% | $99,279 | — | |
| 12 | ROBERT BOSCH LLC | 68 | 86.8% | $88,215 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 23%, Level III: 19%, Level IV: 58% | |
| 13 | Google LLC | 62 | 72.6% | $134,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 64%, Level III: 29%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 14 | JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. | 61 | 78.7% | $75,754 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 15 | LER TechForce, LLC | 58 | 77.6% | $93,600 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 62%, Level II: 31%, Level III: 7% | |
| 16 | Caterpillar Inc. | 57 | 98.2% | $106,668 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 2%, Level II: 43%, Level III: 22%, Level IV: 33% | |
| 17 | Cummins Emission Solutions Inc. | 56 | 76.8% | $62,566 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 18 | Black & Veatch Corporation | 53 | 92.5% | $89,274 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 20%, Level II: 35%, Level III: 5%, Level IV: 40% | |
| 19 | Carnegie Mellon University | 51 | 74.5% | $92,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 95%, Level III: 5% | |
| 20 | MOSS & ASSOCIATES, LLC | 49 | 100.0% | $70,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 78%, Level II: 14%, Level III: 6%, Level IV: 2% | |
| 21 | Microsoft Corporationlast filed FY2023 | 42 | 92.9% | $123,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 100% | |
| 22 | Clearesult Consulting, Inc.last filed FY2019 | 39 | 76.9% | $70,000 | — | |
| 23 | GlobalFoundries U.S., Inc.last filed FY2018 | 37 | 75.7% | $92,123 | — | |
| 24 | M.C. Dean, Inc. | 37 | 81.1% | $74,485 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 62%, Level II: 31%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 25 | Dematic Corp. | 36 | 86.1% | $90,827 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 61%, Level III: 36%, Level IV: 4% | |
| 26 | Ciena Corporation | 35 | 82.9% | $113,564 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 50% | |
| 27 | North American Lighting, Inc. | 34 | 88.2% | $74,485 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 20%, Level II: 80% | |
| 28 | BP America Inc. | 33 | 84.8% | $117,900 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 29 | Meta Platforms, Inc | 33 | 100.0% | $195,808 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 3%, Level II: 19%, Level III: 41%, Level IV: 38% | |
| 30 | Micron Technology, Inc. | 32 | 65.6% | $89,400 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 31 | KLA-TENCOR CORPORATIONlast filed FY2018 | 31 | 80.6% | $110,000 | — | |
| 32 | L&T Technology Services Limited | 30 | 93.3% | $86,380 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 89%, Level III: 11% | |
| 33 | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 29 | 100.0% | $115,788 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 21%, Level II: 29%, Level III: 33%, Level IV: 17% | |
| 34 | NES Global LLClast filed FY2019 | 29 | 55.2% | $74,880 | — | |
| 35 | Belcan Engineering Group, LLClast filed FY2018 | 27 | 92.6% | $70,558 | — | |
| 36 | ENERGY&RESOURCE SOLUTIONS INC.last filed FY2018 | 27 | 85.2% | $73,115 | — | |
| 37 | ArcBest Technologies, Inc. | 26 | 100.0% | $135,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 4%, Level IV: 96% | |
| 38 | FCA US LLC | 26 | 92.3% | $97,637 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 9%, Level II: 27%, Level III: 9%, Level IV: 55% | |
| 39 | Moffatt & Nichol | 26 | 92.3% | $72,946 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 43%, Level IV: 57% | |
| 40 | IAV Automotive Engineering, Inc.last filed FY2018 | 25 | 96.0% | $80,000 | — | |
| 41 | Infinera Corporationlast filed FY2018 | 25 | 76.0% | $118,558 | — | |
| 42 | Quality Design Services, Inc | 25 | 100.0% | $72,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 58%, Level III: 8% | |
| 43 | University of Colorado | 25 | 60.0% | $77,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 72%, Level II: 8%, Level III: 20% |
- Filings
- 419
- Certified
- 91.6%
- Median wage
- $132,300
- Filings
- 157
- Certified
- 91.7%
- Median wage
- $66,960
- Filings
- 137
- Certified
- 97.1%
- Median wage
- $127,171
- Filings
- 115
- Certified
- 76.5%
- Median wage
- $62,400
- Filings
- 111
- Certified
- 93.7%
- Median wage
- $150,000
- Filings
- 104
- Certified
- 76.0%
- Median wage
- $63,107
- Filings
- 100
- Certified
- 99.0%
- Median wage
- $112,573
- Filings
- 95
- Certified
- 94.7%
- Median wage
- $130,000
- Filings
- 93
- Certified
- 92.5%
- Median wage
- $120,987
- Filings
- 73
- Certified
- 97.3%
- Median wage
- $109,980
- Filings
- 73
- Certified
- 95.9%
- Median wage
- $99,279
- Filings
- 68
- Certified
- 86.8%
- Median wage
- $88,215
- Filings
- 62
- Certified
- 72.6%
- Median wage
- $134,000
- Filings
- 61
- Certified
- 78.7%
- Median wage
- $75,754
- Filings
- 58
- Certified
- 77.6%
- Median wage
- $93,600
- Filings
- 57
- Certified
- 98.2%
- Median wage
- $106,668
- Filings
- 56
- Certified
- 76.8%
- Median wage
- $62,566
- Filings
- 53
- Certified
- 92.5%
- Median wage
- $89,274
- Filings
- 51
- Certified
- 74.5%
- Median wage
- $92,000
- Filings
- 49
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 42
- Certified
- 92.9%
- Median wage
- $123,000
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 76.9%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 37
- Certified
- 75.7%
- Median wage
- $92,123
- Filings
- 37
- Certified
- 81.1%
- Median wage
- $74,485
- Filings
- 36
- Certified
- 86.1%
- Median wage
- $90,827
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 82.9%
- Median wage
- $113,564
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 88.2%
- Median wage
- $74,485
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 84.8%
- Median wage
- $117,900
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $195,808
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 65.6%
- Median wage
- $89,400
- Filings
- 31
- Certified
- 80.6%
- Median wage
- $110,000
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 93.3%
- Median wage
- $86,380
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $115,788
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 55.2%
- Median wage
- $74,880
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 92.6%
- Median wage
- $70,558
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 85.2%
- Median wage
- $73,115
- Filings
- 26
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $135,000
- Filings
- 26
- Certified
- 92.3%
- Median wage
- $97,637
- Filings
- 26
- Certified
- 92.3%
- Median wage
- $72,946
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 96.0%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 76.0%
- Median wage
- $118,558
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $72,000
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 60.0%
- Median wage
- $77,500
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Engineers is sponsored
Other states with enough Engineers filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.