Sponsor FinderSOC 13-1051Updated September 2026
H-1B Sponsors for Cost Estimators
26 employers filed 1,941 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Cost Estimators across the US between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 26all listed below
- Filings
- 1,94114% of all 14,309 for this role
- Certified
- 88.6%
- Median wage
- $81,411across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 1,941 of the 14,309 total shown on the Cost Estimators occupation page (14%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-healthNot enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
Showing 26 of 26 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CAPGEMINI AMERICA INC | 441 | 96.1% | $71,800 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 2 | Faithful and Gould Inc.last filed FY2019 | 138 | 66.7% | $87,500 | — | |
| 3 | LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITEDlast filed FY2016 | 110 | 86.4% | $69,000 | — | |
| 4 | Cumming Management Group, Inc. | 101 | 98.0% | $110,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 2%, Level II: 59%, Level III: 10%, Level IV: 29% | |
| 5 | Cumming Construction Management, Inc.last filed FY2019 | 88 | 85.2% | $75,000 | — | |
| 6 | Turner & Townsend, Inc. | 84 | 83.3% | $116,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 9%, Level II: 18%, Level III: 27%, Level IV: 47% | |
| 7 | Trenmor LLC | 79 | 100.0% | $109,970 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 13%, Level II: 28%, Level III: 28%, Level IV: 30% | |
| 8 | VJ ASSOCIATES INC. OF SUFFOLKlast filed FY2018 | 77 | 94.8% | $65,000 | — | |
| 9 | Arcadis U.S., Inc. | 75 | 85.3% | $90,563 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 43%, Level II: 21%, Level IV: 36% | |
| 10 | Black & Veatch Corporation | 73 | 98.6% | $76,800 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 58%, Level II: 31%, Level IV: 12% | |
| 11 | Fluor Enterprises, Inc. | 72 | 79.2% | $87,422 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 6%, Level II: 52%, Level III: 19%, Level IV: 23% | |
| 12 | Rider Levett Bucknall Ltd. | 72 | 83.3% | $72,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 20%, Level III: 20%, Level IV: 60% | |
| 13 | J.T. MAGEN & COMPANY, INC. | 69 | 97.1% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 63%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 25% | |
| 14 | AECOM Technical Services Inc | 67 | 89.6% | $81,120 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 63%, Level II: 17%, Level III: 10%, Level IV: 10% | |
| 15 | Rigid Global Buildings, LLC | 46 | 91.3% | $45,198 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 16 | Cockram Construction, Inc. last filed FY2018 | 41 | 65.9% | $132,000 | — | |
| 17 | Currie & Brown Inc. | 39 | 97.4% | $90,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 12%, Level II: 18%, Level III: 24%, Level IV: 47% | |
| 18 | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 37 | 67.6% | $98,696 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 9%, Level II: 18%, Level III: 9%, Level IV: 64% | |
| 19 | STV Incorporated | 33 | 87.9% | $79,248 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 58%, Level II: 13%, Level III: 21%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 20 | Deloitte Consulting LLPlast filed FY2016 | 31 | 93.5% | $54,000 | — | |
| 21 | JCMS, Inc. | 30 | 93.3% | $80,839 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 33%, Level IV: 67% | |
| 22 | Gardiner & Theobald, Inc. | 29 | 79.3% | $81,411 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 29%, Level III: 29%, Level IV: 43% | |
| 23 | Kal Krishnan Consulting Services, Inc. | 29 | 93.1% | $87,360 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 24 | Cummins Inc. | 27 | 66.7% | $83,600 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 25 | Toscano Clements Taylor LLC | 27 | 100.0% | $90,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 50%, Level III: 38%, Level IV: 13% | |
| 26 | AtkinsRealis USA Inc. | 26 | 73.1% | $92,300 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 13%, Level II: 6%, Level III: 44%, Level IV: 38% |
- Filings
- 441
- Certified
- 96.1%
- Median wage
- $71,800
- Filings
- 138
- Certified
- 66.7%
- Median wage
- $87,500
- Filings
- 110
- Certified
- 86.4%
- Median wage
- $69,000
- Filings
- 101
- Certified
- 98.0%
- Median wage
- $110,000
- Filings
- 88
- Certified
- 85.2%
- Median wage
- $75,000
- Filings
- 84
- Certified
- 83.3%
- Median wage
- $116,500
- Filings
- 79
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $109,970
- Filings
- 77
- Certified
- 94.8%
- Median wage
- $65,000
- Filings
- 75
- Certified
- 85.3%
- Median wage
- $90,563
- Filings
- 73
- Certified
- 98.6%
- Median wage
- $76,800
- Filings
- 72
- Certified
- 79.2%
- Median wage
- $87,422
- Filings
- 72
- Certified
- 83.3%
- Median wage
- $72,500
- Filings
- 69
- Certified
- 97.1%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 67
- Certified
- 89.6%
- Median wage
- $81,120
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 91.3%
- Median wage
- $45,198
- Filings
- 41
- Certified
- 65.9%
- Median wage
- $132,000
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 97.4%
- Median wage
- $90,000
- Filings
- 37
- Certified
- 67.6%
- Median wage
- $98,696
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 87.9%
- Median wage
- $79,248
- Filings
- 31
- Certified
- 93.5%
- Median wage
- $54,000
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 93.3%
- Median wage
- $80,839
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 79.3%
- Median wage
- $81,411
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 93.1%
- Median wage
- $87,360
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 66.7%
- Median wage
- $83,600
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $90,000
- Filings
- 26
- Certified
- 73.1%
- Median wage
- $92,300
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Cost Estimators is sponsored
Other states with enough Cost Estimators filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Understand the data
Definitions and methodology behind these H-1B figures.