H-1B Sponsors for Biological Scientists, All Other in California
21 employers filed 2,085 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Biological Scientists, All Other with worksites in California between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 21all listed below
- Filings
- 2,085
- Certified
- 70.5%
- Median wage
- $91,894across the sponsors listed
How to read this
- An LCA is not a visa. It is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions.
- Certification is a DOL outcome, not a USCIS approval — the I-129 petition is decided separately and is not in this dataset.
- Withdrawn is not denied. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not counted against a sponsor here.
- Offered and prevailing wages are not take-home pay. They are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity.
- Recent years may be incomplete. DOL releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 employers, are not published at all.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Showing 21 of 21 sponsors · all filings, FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Employer | Filings | Certified | Median wage | Wage levels | Sponsor health |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California Institute of Technology | 683 | 53.4% | $48,650 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 2 | REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE | 228 | 75.9% | $43,692 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 3 | University of California, Los Angeles | 161 | 87.0% | $68,900 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 4 | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 140 | 95.7% | $79,086 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 5 | CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY/JET PROPULSION LABORATORY | 94 | 59.6% | $61,984 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 6 | The University of San Francisco | 87 | 87.4% | $67,800 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 7 | University of California, Berkeley | 82 | 78.0% | $76,600 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 8 | Illumina, Inc. | 79 | 70.9% | $91,894 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 9 | Genentech, Inc. | 59 | 62.7% | $107,674 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 10 | Google LLC | 57 | 94.7% | $173,350 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 11 | UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO | 56 | 58.9% | $95,303 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 12 | FACEBOOK, INC. | 49 | 79.6% | $119,487 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 13 | Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc. | 48 | 62.5% | $104,000 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 14 | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 45 | 97.8% | $104,705 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 15 | University of California, Davis | 41 | 68.3% | $69,000 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 16 | Microsoft Corporation | 35 | 85.7% | $143,700 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 17 | UCSF MEDICAL CENTER | 30 | 76.7% | $93,400 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 18 | University of California, Santa Cruz | 29 | 69.0% | $89,540 | — | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 19 | Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute | 28 | 53.6% | $53,160 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 20 | Guardant Health, Inc. | 27 | 96.3% | $137,280 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 21 | Meta Platforms, Inc | 27 | 100.0% | $190,359 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 683
- Certified
- 53.4%
- Median wage
- $48,650
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 228
- Certified
- 75.9%
- Median wage
- $43,692
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 161
- Certified
- 87.0%
- Median wage
- $68,900
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 140
- Certified
- 95.7%
- Median wage
- $79,086
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 94
- Certified
- 59.6%
- Median wage
- $61,984
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 87
- Certified
- 87.4%
- Median wage
- $67,800
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 82
- Certified
- 78.0%
- Median wage
- $76,600
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 79
- Certified
- 70.9%
- Median wage
- $91,894
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 59
- Certified
- 62.7%
- Median wage
- $107,674
- #10Google LLCDerived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 57
- Certified
- 94.7%
- Median wage
- $173,350
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 56
- Certified
- 58.9%
- Median wage
- $95,303
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 49
- Certified
- 79.6%
- Median wage
- $119,487
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 48
- Certified
- 62.5%
- Median wage
- $104,000
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 45
- Certified
- 97.8%
- Median wage
- $104,705
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 41
- Certified
- 68.3%
- Median wage
- $69,000
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 85.7%
- Median wage
- $143,700
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 76.7%
- Median wage
- $93,400
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 69.0%
- Median wage
- $89,540
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 53.6%
- Median wage
- $53,160
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 96.3%
- Median wage
- $137,280
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $190,359
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Biological Scientists is sponsored
Other states with enough Biological Scientists filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Other occupations sponsored in California
Roles with a publishable sponsor breakdown in this state.