Sponsor FinderSOC 13-2011CAUpdated September 2026
H-1B Sponsors for Accountants and Auditors in California
59 employers filed 9,782 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Accountants and Auditors with worksites in California between FY2010 and FY2026. The 50 largest are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 59top 50 listed
- Filings
- 9,78228% of all 34,326 for this role
- Certified
- 94.2%across those listed
- Median wage
- $73,000across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation in this state, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 9,782 of the 34,326 total shown on the Accountants and Auditors occupation page (28%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Top 50 sponsors, ranked
The 50 highest-volume of 59 employers that filed for this role here. Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-healthNot enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
This employer filed at least one WARN Act notice in the last 24 months — a state-mandated advance announcement of a planned mass layoff or closure. A notice is an announcement, not a completed layoff, and it is not evidence of any link between the employer’s H-1B filings and its workforce plans.
Showing 50 of 50 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ernst & Young U.S. LLP | 3,879 | 96.7% | $92,396 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 19%, Level II: 47%, Level III: 26%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 2 | Deloitte & Touche LLP | 1,268 | 98.6% | $66,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 44%, Level II: 45%, Level IV: 12% | |
| 3 | PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPlast filed FY2019 | 1,026 | 96.7% | $72,155 | — | |
| 4 | Deloitte Tax LLP | 922 | 98.6% | $83,800 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 30%, Level II: 48%, Level III: 0%, Level IV: 22% | |
| 5 | Chen & Fan Accountancy Corporation | 187 | 59.9% | $53,830 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 93%, Level II: 7% | |
| 6 | Google LLC | 138 | 79.0% | $120,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 7%, Level II: 17%, Level III: 49%, Level IV: 27% | |
| 7 | BDO USA, LLPlast filed FY2019 | 122 | 92.6% | $70,000 | — | |
| 8 | Grant Thornton LLP | 102 | 84.3% | $77,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 20%, Level II: 55%, Level III: 10%, Level IV: 15% | |
| 9 | AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC (WA)last filed FY2023 | 95 | 97.9% | $104,900 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 42%, Level III: 58% | |
| 10 | AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC (VA) | 94 | 98.9% | $115,992 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 1%, Level II: 34%, Level III: 58%, Level IV: 6% | |
| 11 | Hotta Liesenberg Saito LLPlast filed FY2019 | 81 | 71.6% | $55,000 | — | |
| 12 | Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP | 75 | 94.7% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 49%, Level II: 29%, Level III: 14%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 13 | SingerLewak LLP | 69 | 65.2% | $73,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 23%, Level II: 46%, Level III: 17%, Level IV: 14% | |
| 14 | eBay Inc. | 68 | 77.9% | $122,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 36%, Level III: 27%, Level IV: 36% | |
| 15 | Oracle America, Inc. | 68 | 89.7% | $94,842 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 16 | BHATIA & CO, INC, CPAS | 63 | 85.7% | $55,661 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 50% | |
| 17 | Nadadur Vardhan, Inc. | 59 | 89.8% | $47,278 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 100% | |
| 18 | Moss Adams LLP | 57 | 82.5% | $92,875 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 5%, Level II: 5%, Level III: 21%, Level IV: 68% | |
| 19 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | 54 | 92.6% | $105,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 10%, Level II: 29%, Level III: 24%, Level IV: 38% | |
| 20 | BDO USA, P.C. | 52 | 90.4% | $127,950 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 29%, Level III: 56%, Level IV: 15% | |
| 21 | Eric Zhang & Associates, LLP | 51 | 94.1% | $52,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 87%, Level II: 13% | |
| 22 | Green Hasson & Janks LLP | 49 | 100.0% | $71,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 25%, Level III: 25%, Level IV: 50% | |
| 23 | Grant Thornton Advisors LLC | 48 | 95.8% | $106,330 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 2%, Level II: 69%, Level III: 19%, Level IV: 10% | |
| 24 | Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP | 46 | 73.9% | $96,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 26%, Level II: 61%, Level III: 3%, Level IV: 11% | |
| 25 | Armanino LLP | 45 | 91.1% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 23%, Level II: 31%, Level III: 23%, Level IV: 23% | |
| 26 | EOS Accountants LLP | 43 | 65.1% | $57,304 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 27 | Robert Chang Accountancy Corporation | 43 | 93.0% | $55,786 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 28 | SOAPROJECTS, INClast filed FY2018 | 40 | 92.5% | $115,000 | — | |
| 29 | ACG, LLPlast filed FY2018 | 39 | 89.7% | $59,000 | — | |
| 30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | 39 | 89.7% | $81,800 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 80%, Level III: 20% | |
| 31 | Standish Management US LLC | 39 | 97.4% | $93,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 64%, Level II: 21%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 3% | |
| 32 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | 38 | 81.6% | $98,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 25%, Level IV: 75% | |
| 33 | CHUGH CPAS, LLP | 35 | 80.0% | $63,086 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 55%, Level II: 18%, Level III: 9%, Level IV: 18% | |
| 34 | Vasquez & Company, LLP | 35 | 97.1% | $60,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 20%, Level II: 80% | |
| 35 | CHOI, KIM & PARK, LLPlast filed FY2017 | 34 | 85.3% | $47,528 | — | |
| 36 | Gumbiner Savett, Inc.last filed FY2018 | 34 | 100.0% | $71,300 | — | |
| 37 | Mah & Associates, LLP | 34 | 94.1% | $58,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 75%, Level II: 25% | |
| 38 | LINDQUIST VON HUSEN AND JOYCE LLP | 32 | 87.5% | $73,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 14%, Level II: 57%, Level III: 14%, Level IV: 14% | |
| 39 | PayPal, Inc. | 31 | 83.9% | $132,787 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 11%, Level IV: 89% | |
| 40 | Harry C. Lin, CPA, A Prof. Corp. | 30 | 100.0% | $47,445 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 88%, Level II: 13% | |
| 41 | MA LABORATORIES, INC. | 30 | 73.3% | $39,416 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 42 | BPM LLP | 29 | 75.9% | $100,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 8%, Level II: 17%, Level III: 67%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 43 | Christopher Huang CPAs, Inc. | 29 | 100.0% | $56,160 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 44 | Netflix, Inc. | 29 | 86.2% | $120,453 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 45 | Seiler, LLPlast filed FY2019 | 29 | 89.7% | $78,374 | — | |
| 46 | Sensiba San Filippo LLPlast filed FY2019 | 29 | 82.8% | $62,000 | — | |
| 47 | Connor Group, Inc. | 28 | 75.0% | $97,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 67%, Level IV: 33% | |
| 48 | Meta Platforms, Inc | 28 | 100.0% | $191,314 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 4%, Level II: 15%, Level III: 11%, Level IV: 70% | |
| 49 | TURNER, WARREN, HWANG & CONRAD ACCOUNTANCY CORPlast filed FY2019 | 28 | 67.9% | $55,000 | — | |
| 50 | Cheung & Chu, CPA, A Professional Corporationlast filed FY2018 | 27 | 92.6% | $62,192 | — |
- Filings
- 3,879
- Certified
- 96.7%
- Median wage
- $92,396
- Filings
- 1,268
- Certified
- 98.6%
- Median wage
- $66,000
- Filings
- 1,026
- Certified
- 96.7%
- Median wage
- $72,155
- Filings
- 922
- Certified
- 98.6%
- Median wage
- $83,800
- Filings
- 187
- Certified
- 59.9%
- Median wage
- $53,830
- Filings
- 138
- Certified
- 79.0%
- Median wage
- $120,000
- Filings
- 122
- Certified
- 92.6%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 102
- Certified
- 84.3%
- Median wage
- $77,000
- Filings
- 95
- Certified
- 97.9%
- Median wage
- $104,900
- Filings
- 94
- Certified
- 98.9%
- Median wage
- $115,992
- Filings
- 81
- Certified
- 71.6%
- Median wage
- $55,000
- Filings
- 75
- Certified
- 94.7%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 69
- Certified
- 65.2%
- Median wage
- $73,000
- Filings
- 68
- Certified
- 77.9%
- Median wage
- $122,500
- Filings
- 68
- Certified
- 89.7%
- Median wage
- $94,842
- Filings
- 63
- Certified
- 85.7%
- Median wage
- $55,661
- Filings
- 59
- Certified
- 89.8%
- Median wage
- $47,278
- Filings
- 57
- Certified
- 82.5%
- Median wage
- $92,875
- Filings
- 54
- Certified
- 92.6%
- Median wage
- $105,000
- Filings
- 52
- Certified
- 90.4%
- Median wage
- $127,950
- Filings
- 51
- Certified
- 94.1%
- Median wage
- $52,000
- Filings
- 49
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $71,000
- Filings
- 48
- Certified
- 95.8%
- Median wage
- $106,330
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 73.9%
- Median wage
- $96,500
- Filings
- 45
- Certified
- 91.1%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 43
- Certified
- 65.1%
- Median wage
- $57,304
- Filings
- 43
- Certified
- 93.0%
- Median wage
- $55,786
- Filings
- 40
- Certified
- 92.5%
- Median wage
- $115,000
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 89.7%
- Median wage
- $59,000
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 89.7%
- Median wage
- $81,800
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 97.4%
- Median wage
- $93,000
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 81.6%
- Median wage
- $98,500
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 80.0%
- Median wage
- $63,086
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 97.1%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 85.3%
- Median wage
- $47,528
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $71,300
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 94.1%
- Median wage
- $58,500
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 87.5%
- Median wage
- $73,000
- Filings
- 31
- Certified
- 83.9%
- Median wage
- $132,787
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $47,445
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 73.3%
- Median wage
- $39,416
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 75.9%
- Median wage
- $100,000
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $56,160
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 86.2%
- Median wage
- $120,453
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 89.7%
- Median wage
- $78,374
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 82.8%
- Median wage
- $62,000
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 75.0%
- Median wage
- $97,000
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $191,314
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 67.9%
- Median wage
- $55,000
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 92.6%
- Median wage
- $62,192
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Accountants and Auditors is sponsored
Other states with enough Accountants and Auditors filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Other occupations sponsored in California
Roles with a publishable sponsor breakdown in this state.
Software Developers50Computer Occupations50Computer Systems Analysts50Electronics Engineers50Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers50Computer Programmers50Data Scientists50Management Analysts50Biochemists and Biophysicists30Computer and Information Systems Managers50Mechanical Engineers50Industrial Engineers50
Understand the data
Definitions and methodology behind these H-1B figures.