H-1B Sponsors for Accountants and Auditors
184 employers filed 48,194 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Accountants and Auditors across the US between FY2010 and FY2026. The 50 largest are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 184top 50 listed
- Filings
- 48,19430% of all 159,700 for this role
- Certified
- 95.8%across those listed
- Median wage
- $80,000across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 48,194 of the 159,700 total shown on the Accountants and Auditors occupation page (30%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Top 50 sponsors, ranked
The 50 highest-volume of 184 employers that filed for this role here. Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
This employer filed at least one WARN Act notice in the last 24 months — a state-mandated advance announcement of a planned mass layoff or closure. A notice is an announcement, not a completed layoff, and it is not evidence of any link between the employer’s H-1B filings and its workforce plans.
Showing 50 of 50 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ernst & Young U.S. LLP | 18,910 | 96.7% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 18%, Level II: 50%, Level III: 24%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 2 | Deloitte & Touche LLP | 6,965 | 98.6% | $60,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 43%, Level II: 46%, Level IV: 11% | |
| 3 | PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPlast filed FY2019 | 4,825 | 97.5% | $70,000 | — | |
| 4 | Deloitte Tax LLP | 4,432 | 99.0% | $78,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 38%, Level II: 42%, Level III: 0%, Level IV: 20% | |
| 5 | AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC (VA) | 1,095 | 99.6% | $109,325 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 1%, Level II: 38%, Level III: 51%, Level IV: 10% | |
| 6 | AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC (WA)last filed FY2023 | 964 | 96.2% | $106,525 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 0%, Level II: 40%, Level III: 58%, Level IV: 2% | |
| 7 | BDO USA, LLPlast filed FY2019 | 808 | 91.5% | $70,000 | — | |
| 8 | Grant Thornton LLP | 507 | 85.8% | $72,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 15%, Level II: 58%, Level III: 10%, Level IV: 18% | |
| 9 | GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. LLC | 277 | 100.0% | $103,600 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 18%, Level II: 68%, Level III: 9%, Level IV: 5% | |
| 10 | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 270 | 86.3% | $94,075 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 7%, Level II: 34%, Level III: 32%, Level IV: 26% | |
| 11 | Google LLC | 226 | 81.4% | $119,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 4%, Level II: 24%, Level III: 43%, Level IV: 29% | |
| 12 | Hotta Liesenberg Saito LLPlast filed FY2019 | 192 | 72.4% | $55,370 | — | |
| 13 | BDO USA, P.C. | 189 | 96.3% | $113,818 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 2%, Level II: 41%, Level III: 41%, Level IV: 16% | |
| 14 | Chen & Fan Accountancy Corporation | 187 | 59.9% | $53,830 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 93%, Level II: 7% | |
| 15 | EOS Accountants LLP | 173 | 64.7% | $56,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 73%, Level II: 27% | |
| 16 | Grant Thornton Advisors LLC | 172 | 95.9% | $108,148 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 2%, Level II: 59%, Level III: 25%, Level IV: 14% | |
| 17 | RSM US LLP | 165 | 75.8% | $94,710 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 11%, Level II: 30%, Level III: 33%, Level IV: 27% | |
| 18 | Ernst & Young LLP (EY GUAM) | 148 | 93.2% | $45,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 7%, Level II: 74%, Level III: 16%, Level IV: 4% | |
| 19 | Amazon Retail LLC | 141 | 94.3% | $83,554 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 75%, Level IV: 25% | |
| 20 | Crowe, LLP | 133 | 81.2% | $85,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 32%, Level III: 8%, Level IV: 10% | |
| 21 | KPMG LLP | 127 | 91.3% | $60,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 40%, Level II: 43%, Level III: 12%, Level IV: 5% | |
| 22 | Microsoft Corporation | 115 | 89.6% | $105,097 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 71%, Level III: 14%, Level IV: 14% | |
| 23 | Cummins Inc. | 114 | 86.0% | $70,602 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 46%, Level III: 32%, Level IV: 21% | |
| 24 | MaloneBailey LLP | 107 | 82.2% | $53,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 30%, Level III: 15%, Level IV: 5% | |
| 25 | FMR LLC | 100 | 98.0% | $84,222 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 6%, Level II: 56%, Level III: 31%, Level IV: 6% | |
| 26 | Marcum LLP | 90 | 80.0% | $81,660 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 27%, Level II: 27%, Level III: 38%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 27 | Moss Adams LLP | 87 | 87.4% | $95,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 3%, Level II: 6%, Level III: 22%, Level IV: 69% | |
| 28 | Barclays Services Corp. | 86 | 70.9% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 40%, Level III: 20%, Level IV: 40% | |
| 29 | eBay Inc. | 83 | 77.1% | $122,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 13%, Level II: 21%, Level III: 33%, Level IV: 33% | |
| 30 | Wei, Wei & Co., LLP | 81 | 93.8% | $55,432 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 90%, Level II: 10% | |
| 31 | Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP | 80 | 95.0% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 47%, Level II: 27%, Level III: 16%, Level IV: 10% | |
| 32 | PwC US Tax LLP | 80 | 100.0% | $121,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 24%, Level II: 66%, Level III: 4%, Level IV: 6% | |
| 33 | Amazon Web Services, Inc. | 79 | 98.7% | $84,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 17%, Level III: 75%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 34 | SingerLewak LLP | 78 | 61.5% | $72,456 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 23%, Level II: 49%, Level III: 14%, Level IV: 14% | |
| 35 | Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP | 77 | 76.6% | $91,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 34%, Level II: 54%, Level III: 3%, Level IV: 9% | |
| 36 | Oracle America, Inc. | 76 | 89.5% | $94,774 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 20%, Level IV: 80% | |
| 37 | CrossCountry Consulting LLC | 75 | 56.0% | $74,200 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 18%, Level II: 82% | |
| 38 | EisnerAmper LLP | 75 | 89.3% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 39 | UST GLOBAL INC | 73 | 93.2% | $97,200 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 40 | K.K. Mehta CPA Associates, PLLClast filed FY2018 | 72 | 94.4% | $57,000 | — | |
| 41 | Anchin, Block and Anchin LLP. | 69 | 85.5% | $83,200 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 66%, Level II: 20%, Level IV: 14% | |
| 42 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporationlast filed FY2019 | 69 | 47.8% | $74,400 | — | |
| 43 | KNAV P.A.last filed FY2018 | 68 | 85.3% | $54,891 | — | |
| 44 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | 68 | 92.6% | $106,872 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 6%, Level II: 28%, Level III: 28%, Level IV: 38% | |
| 45 | Friedman Corporationlast filed FY2018 | 67 | 95.5% | $58,026 | — | |
| 46 | TRIANGLE ACCOUNTING, INC. | 67 | 89.6% | $50,086 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 80%, Level II: 20% | |
| 47 | Citibank, N.A. | 66 | 95.5% | $142,755 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 4%, Level II: 11%, Level IV: 85% | |
| 48 | Padilla & Company, LLP | 66 | 89.4% | $55,765 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 72%, Level II: 28% | |
| 49 | AIG Employee Services, Inc. | 65 | 56.9% | $65,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 50% | |
| 50 | BHATIA & CO, INC, CPAS | 65 | 86.2% | $55,661 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 50% |
- Filings
- 18,910
- Certified
- 96.7%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 6,965
- Certified
- 98.6%
- Median wage
- $60,500
- Filings
- 4,825
- Certified
- 97.5%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 4,432
- Certified
- 99.0%
- Median wage
- $78,000
- Filings
- 1,095
- Certified
- 99.6%
- Median wage
- $109,325
- Filings
- 964
- Certified
- 96.2%
- Median wage
- $106,525
- Filings
- 808
- Certified
- 91.5%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 507
- Certified
- 85.8%
- Median wage
- $72,000
- Filings
- 277
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $103,600
- Filings
- 270
- Certified
- 86.3%
- Median wage
- $94,075
- Filings
- 226
- Certified
- 81.4%
- Median wage
- $119,000
- Filings
- 192
- Certified
- 72.4%
- Median wage
- $55,370
- Filings
- 189
- Certified
- 96.3%
- Median wage
- $113,818
- Filings
- 187
- Certified
- 59.9%
- Median wage
- $53,830
- Filings
- 173
- Certified
- 64.7%
- Median wage
- $56,000
- Filings
- 172
- Certified
- 95.9%
- Median wage
- $108,148
- Filings
- 165
- Certified
- 75.8%
- Median wage
- $94,710
- Filings
- 148
- Certified
- 93.2%
- Median wage
- $45,000
- Filings
- 141
- Certified
- 94.3%
- Median wage
- $83,554
- Filings
- 133
- Certified
- 81.2%
- Median wage
- $85,000
- Filings
- 127
- Certified
- 91.3%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Filings
- 115
- Certified
- 89.6%
- Median wage
- $105,097
- Filings
- 114
- Certified
- 86.0%
- Median wage
- $70,602
- Filings
- 107
- Certified
- 82.2%
- Median wage
- $53,000
- Filings
- 100
- Certified
- 98.0%
- Median wage
- $84,222
- Filings
- 90
- Certified
- 80.0%
- Median wage
- $81,660
- Filings
- 87
- Certified
- 87.4%
- Median wage
- $95,000
- Filings
- 86
- Certified
- 70.9%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 83
- Certified
- 77.1%
- Median wage
- $122,000
- Filings
- 81
- Certified
- 93.8%
- Median wage
- $55,432
- Filings
- 80
- Certified
- 95.0%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 80
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $121,000
- Filings
- 79
- Certified
- 98.7%
- Median wage
- $84,000
- Filings
- 78
- Certified
- 61.5%
- Median wage
- $72,456
- Filings
- 77
- Certified
- 76.6%
- Median wage
- $91,000
- Filings
- 76
- Certified
- 89.5%
- Median wage
- $94,774
- Filings
- 75
- Certified
- 56.0%
- Median wage
- $74,200
- Filings
- 75
- Certified
- 89.3%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 73
- Certified
- 93.2%
- Median wage
- $97,200
- Filings
- 72
- Certified
- 94.4%
- Median wage
- $57,000
- Filings
- 69
- Certified
- 85.5%
- Median wage
- $83,200
- Filings
- 69
- Certified
- 47.8%
- Median wage
- $74,400
- Filings
- 68
- Certified
- 85.3%
- Median wage
- $54,891
- Filings
- 68
- Certified
- 92.6%
- Median wage
- $106,872
- Filings
- 67
- Certified
- 95.5%
- Median wage
- $58,026
- Filings
- 67
- Certified
- 89.6%
- Median wage
- $50,086
- Filings
- 66
- Certified
- 95.5%
- Median wage
- $142,755
- Filings
- 66
- Certified
- 89.4%
- Median wage
- $55,765
- Filings
- 65
- Certified
- 56.9%
- Median wage
- $65,000
- Filings
- 65
- Certified
- 86.2%
- Median wage
- $55,661
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Accountants and Auditors is sponsored
Other states with enough Accountants and Auditors filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.