H-1B Sponsors for Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers in Wisconsin
15 employers filed 1,164 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers with worksites in Wisconsin between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 15all listed below
- Filings
- 1,164
- Certified
- 96.8%
- Median wage
- $62,000across the sponsors listed
How to read this
- An LCA is not a visa. It is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions.
- Certification is a DOL outcome, not a USCIS approval — the I-129 petition is decided separately and is not in this dataset.
- Withdrawn is not denied. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not counted against a sponsor here.
- Offered and prevailing wages are not take-home pay. They are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity.
- Recent years may be incomplete. DOL releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 employers, are not published at all.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Showing 15 of 15 sponsors · all filings, FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Employer | Filings | Certified | Median wage | Wage levels | Sponsor health |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INFOSYS LIMITED | 444 | 100.0% | $67,356 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 2 | CAPGEMINI AMERICA INC | 211 | 91.5% | $60,700 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 3 | LTIMindtree Limited | 68 | 100.0% | $78,166 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 4 | Accenture LLP | 59 | 98.3% | $55,100 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 5 | TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED | 57 | 100.0% | $62,000 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 6 | L&T Technology Services Limited | 44 | 86.4% | $60,000 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 7 | COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS US CORP | 42 | 100.0% | $74,506 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 8 | FIS Management Services, LLC | 33 | 87.9% | $85,000 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 9 | PYRAMID TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC | 33 | 87.9% | $56,326 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 10 | HTC GLOBAL SERVICES INC. | 31 | 100.0% | $70,000 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 11 | Cavisson Systems, Inc. | 30 | 100.0% | $74,000 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 12 | LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED | 29 | 100.0% | $60,000 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
| 13 | Symphony Corporation | 28 | 89.3% | $75,000 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 14 | Tech Mahindra (Americas) Inc. | 28 | 100.0% | $61,733 | Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health | |
| 15 | L&T TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LLC | 27 | 96.3% | $60,000 | — | Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health |
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 444
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $67,356
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 211
- Certified
- 91.5%
- Median wage
- $60,700
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 68
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $78,166
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 59
- Certified
- 98.3%
- Median wage
- $55,100
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 57
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $62,000
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 44
- Certified
- 86.4%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 42
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $74,506
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 87.9%
- Median wage
- $85,000
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 87.9%
- Median wage
- $56,326
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 31
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $74,000
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 89.3%
- Median wage
- $75,000
- Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $61,733
- Not enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 96.3%
- Median wage
- $60,000
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers is sponsored
Other states with enough Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Other occupations sponsored in Wisconsin
Roles with a publishable sponsor breakdown in this state.