H-1B Sponsors for Architects, Except Landscape and Naval
58 employers filed 10,131 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Architects, Except Landscape and Naval across the US between FY2010 and FY2026. The 50 largest are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 58top 50 listed
- Filings
- 10,13131% of all 32,271 for this role
- Certified
- 87.9%across those listed
- Median wage
- $61,173across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 10,131 of the 32,271 total shown on the Architects occupation page (31%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Top 50 sponsors, ranked
The 50 highest-volume of 58 employers that filed for this role here. Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
This employer filed at least one WARN Act notice in the last 24 months — a state-mandated advance announcement of a planned mass layoff or closure. A notice is an announcement, not a completed layoff, and it is not evidence of any link between the employer’s H-1B filings and its workforce plans.
Showing 50 of 50 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WIPRO LIMITEDlast filed FY2019 | 5,182 | 90.7% | $71,739 | — | |
| 2 | Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates PC | 423 | 68.3% | $63,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 58%, Level II: 36%, Level III: 5% | |
| 3 | UST GLOBAL INClast filed FY2019 | 396 | 95.2% | $72,000 | — | |
| 4 | INFOSYS LIMITED | 302 | 100.0% | $94,682 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 67%, Level III: 33% | |
| 5 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP | 259 | 91.9% | $62,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 65%, Level II: 33%, Level III: 2% | |
| 6 | M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc. | 203 | 87.2% | $55,058 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 7 | SmithGroup, Inc., subsidiary of SmithGroup Co., Inc. | 203 | 77.8% | $60,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 82%, Level II: 18% | |
| 8 | Perkins & Will, Inc. | 186 | 86.6% | $60,240 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 71%, Level II: 26%, Level III: 2%, Level IV: 2% | |
| 9 | Perkins Eastman Architects DPC | 186 | 96.2% | $52,187 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 62%, Level II: 38% | |
| 10 | Robert A.M. Stern Architects, LLP | 160 | 74.4% | $60,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 69%, Level II: 23%, Level III: 9% | |
| 11 | Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc. | 159 | 84.9% | $63,203 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 74%, Level II: 22%, Level III: 2%, Level IV: 2% | |
| 12 | AECOM Technical Services Inc | 125 | 68.8% | $55,799 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 45%, Level II: 55% | |
| 13 | Corgan Associates, Inc. | 124 | 83.9% | $60,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 81%, Level II: 12%, Level III: 7% | |
| 14 | HANDEL ARCHITECTS LLP | 114 | 98.2% | $64,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 66%, Level II: 31%, Level III: 3% | |
| 15 | HDR Architecture, Inc. | 102 | 90.2% | $72,800 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 65%, Level II: 23%, Level III: 9%, Level IV: 2% | |
| 16 | HKS, Inc. | 97 | 79.4% | $63,502 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 79%, Level II: 13%, Level III: 8% | |
| 17 | Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Architects LLP | 93 | 82.8% | $61,173 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 73%, Level II: 17%, Level III: 3%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 18 | B.I.G. Architecture D.P.C. | 87 | 73.6% | $67,434 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 90%, Level II: 10% | |
| 19 | NBBJ LP | 76 | 89.5% | $56,200 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 20 | RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS P.C. | 75 | 92.0% | $50,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 71%, Level IV: 29% | |
| 21 | CANNON DESIGN, INC. | 70 | 92.9% | $68,055 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 95%, Level III: 5% | |
| 22 | Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects, Inc.last filed FY2018 | 69 | 76.8% | $50,000 | — | |
| 23 | CALLISONRTKL INC.last filed FY2018 | 66 | 77.3% | $52,239 | — | |
| 24 | Laguarda Low Architects, LLC. | 66 | 90.9% | $55,482 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 25 | MBH Architects Inc. | 60 | 70.0% | $57,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 26 | GRIMSHAW ARCHITECTS P.C. | 55 | 85.5% | $57,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 27 | Wipro Enterprises, Inc.last filed FY2017 | 55 | 61.8% | $75,462 | — | |
| 28 | Simpson Gumpertz and Heger Inc. | 54 | 75.9% | $71,240 | — | |
| 29 | Ennead Architects LLP | 53 | 100.0% | $58,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 64%, Level II: 36% | |
| 30 | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 52 | 80.8% | $69,653 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 37%, Level II: 26%, Level III: 21%, Level IV: 16% | |
| 31 | STV Incorporated | 51 | 88.2% | $75,005 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 54%, Level II: 29%, Level III: 18% | |
| 32 | Stantec Architecture Inc. | 48 | 77.1% | $67,257 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 74%, Level II: 19%, Level III: 7% | |
| 33 | Deloitte Consulting LLPlast filed FY2018 | 47 | 95.7% | $70,491 | — | |
| 34 | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 47 | 89.4% | $110,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 32%, Level III: 47%, Level IV: 21% | |
| 35 | Elkus Manfredi Architects, Ltd. | 46 | 84.8% | $61,825 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 67%, Level II: 33% | |
| 36 | Studio Gang Architects | 46 | 91.3% | $67,080 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 56%, Level II: 44% | |
| 37 | Harley Ellis Devereaux Corporation | 45 | 73.3% | $56,160 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 60%, Level II: 20%, Level III: 20% | |
| 38 | ISMAEL LEYVA ARCHITECTS, P.C. | 40 | 90.0% | $56,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 60%, Level II: 40% | |
| 39 | ODA Architecture, P.C. | 38 | 89.5% | $61,250 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 11%, Level II: 78%, Level III: 11% | |
| 40 | HLW International LLP | 37 | 83.8% | $74,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 57%, Level II: 29%, Level IV: 14% | |
| 41 | Microsoft Corporationlast filed FY2019 | 37 | 86.5% | $126,070 | — | |
| 42 | Adrian Smith & Gordon Gill Architecture LLP | 34 | 100.0% | $50,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 43 | Nagase America LLC last filed FY2017 | 33 | 48.5% | $45,000 | — | |
| 44 | REI Systems Inc. | 33 | 90.9% | $116,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 50%, Level III: 50% | |
| 45 | Studio T-SQ Inc. | 33 | 63.6% | $47,840 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 46 | Populous Group, LLC | 32 | 93.8% | $88,848 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 67%, Level II: 19%, Level III: 7%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 47 | Goettsch Partners, Inc. | 30 | 83.3% | $56,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 48 | NBBJ Architecture PLLC | 30 | 90.0% | $55,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 49 | Archilier LLClast filed FY2018 | 29 | 75.9% | $57,574 | — | |
| 50 | DLR Group, Inc. | 29 | 89.7% | $55,952 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% |
- Filings
- 5,182
- Certified
- 90.7%
- Median wage
- $71,739
- Filings
- 423
- Certified
- 68.3%
- Median wage
- $63,000
- Filings
- 396
- Certified
- 95.2%
- Median wage
- $72,000
- Filings
- 302
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $94,682
- Filings
- 259
- Certified
- 91.9%
- Median wage
- $62,000
- Filings
- 203
- Certified
- 87.2%
- Median wage
- $55,058
- Filings
- 203
- Certified
- 77.8%
- Median wage
- $60,500
- Filings
- 186
- Certified
- 86.6%
- Median wage
- $60,240
- Filings
- 186
- Certified
- 96.2%
- Median wage
- $52,187
- Filings
- 160
- Certified
- 74.4%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Filings
- 159
- Certified
- 84.9%
- Median wage
- $63,203
- Filings
- 125
- Certified
- 68.8%
- Median wage
- $55,799
- Filings
- 124
- Certified
- 83.9%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Filings
- 114
- Certified
- 98.2%
- Median wage
- $64,000
- Filings
- 102
- Certified
- 90.2%
- Median wage
- $72,800
- Filings
- 97
- Certified
- 79.4%
- Median wage
- $63,502
- Filings
- 93
- Certified
- 82.8%
- Median wage
- $61,173
- Filings
- 87
- Certified
- 73.6%
- Median wage
- $67,434
- Filings
- 76
- Certified
- 89.5%
- Median wage
- $56,200
- Filings
- 75
- Certified
- 92.0%
- Median wage
- $50,000
- Filings
- 70
- Certified
- 92.9%
- Median wage
- $68,055
- Filings
- 69
- Certified
- 76.8%
- Median wage
- $50,000
- Filings
- 66
- Certified
- 77.3%
- Median wage
- $52,239
- Filings
- 66
- Certified
- 90.9%
- Median wage
- $55,482
- Filings
- 60
- Certified
- 70.0%
- Median wage
- $57,000
- Filings
- 55
- Certified
- 85.5%
- Median wage
- $57,000
- Filings
- 55
- Certified
- 61.8%
- Median wage
- $75,462
- Filings
- 54
- Certified
- 75.9%
- Median wage
- $71,240
- Filings
- 53
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $58,000
- Filings
- 52
- Certified
- 80.8%
- Median wage
- $69,653
- Filings
- 51
- Certified
- 88.2%
- Median wage
- $75,005
- Filings
- 48
- Certified
- 77.1%
- Median wage
- $67,257
- Filings
- 47
- Certified
- 95.7%
- Median wage
- $70,491
- Filings
- 47
- Certified
- 89.4%
- Median wage
- $110,000
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 84.8%
- Median wage
- $61,825
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 91.3%
- Median wage
- $67,080
- Filings
- 45
- Certified
- 73.3%
- Median wage
- $56,160
- Filings
- 40
- Certified
- 90.0%
- Median wage
- $56,000
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 89.5%
- Median wage
- $61,250
- Filings
- 37
- Certified
- 83.8%
- Median wage
- $74,000
- Filings
- 37
- Certified
- 86.5%
- Median wage
- $126,070
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $50,500
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 48.5%
- Median wage
- $45,000
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 90.9%
- Median wage
- $116,000
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 63.6%
- Median wage
- $47,840
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 93.8%
- Median wage
- $88,848
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 83.3%
- Median wage
- $56,500
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 90.0%
- Median wage
- $55,000
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 75.9%
- Median wage
- $57,574
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 89.7%
- Median wage
- $55,952
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Architects is sponsored
Other states with enough Architects filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.