Sponsor FinderSOC 11-9041Updated September 2026
H-1B Sponsors for Architectural and Engineering Managers
40 employers filed 3,401 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Architectural and Engineering Managers across the US between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 40all listed below
- Filings
- 3,40115% of all 22,697 for this role
- Certified
- 90.9%
- Median wage
- $130,603across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 3,401 of the 22,697 total shown on the Architectural and Engineering Managers occupation page (15%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-healthNot enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
This employer filed at least one WARN Act notice in the last 24 months — a state-mandated advance announcement of a planned mass layoff or closure. A notice is an announcement, not a completed layoff, and it is not evidence of any link between the employer’s H-1B filings and its workforce plans.
Showing 40 of 40 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intel Corporation | 430 | 97.4% | $164,574 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 8%, Level II: 21%, Level III: 35%, Level IV: 36% | |
| 2 | Accenture LLP | 332 | 97.6% | $116,900 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 89%, Level IV: 11% | |
| 3 | GlobalFoundries U.S., Inc. | 294 | 77.2% | $79,789 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 4 | NVIDIA Corporation | 192 | 97.4% | $224,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 6%, Level II: 45%, Level III: 24%, Level IV: 26% | |
| 5 | FACEBOOK, INC.last filed FY2019 | 185 | 88.6% | $196,634 | — | |
| 6 | FORD MOTOR COMPANY | 159 | 89.9% | $84,302 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 15%, Level II: 23%, Level III: 31%, Level IV: 31% | |
| 7 | Apple Inc. | 139 | 96.4% | $197,300 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 71%, Level III: 23%, Level IV: 6% | |
| 8 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | 125 | 88.8% | $162,885 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 56%, Level III: 39%, Level IV: 6% | |
| 9 | Tesla, Inc. | 111 | 88.3% | $183,714 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 5%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 82% | |
| 10 | KLA-TENCOR CORPORATIONlast filed FY2018 | 101 | 89.1% | $102,000 | — | |
| 11 | Google LLC | 96 | 94.8% | $245,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 9%, Level III: 65%, Level IV: 26% | |
| 12 | Lam Research Corporation | 71 | 93.0% | $117,420 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 21%, Level II: 43%, Level III: 29%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 13 | Microsoft Corporation | 71 | 97.2% | $126,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 22%, Level III: 44%, Level IV: 33% | |
| 14 | ASM AMERICA INC. | 64 | 79.7% | $110,448 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 74%, Level IV: 26% | |
| 15 | Micron Technology, Inc. | 61 | 86.9% | $96,750 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 15%, Level II: 54%, Level III: 8%, Level IV: 23% | |
| 16 | DoorDash, Inc. | 60 | 86.7% | $237,994 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 4%, Level III: 26%, Level IV: 70% | |
| 17 | Expedia, Inc. | 57 | 77.2% | $130,603 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 18 | Cerner Technologies LLClast filed FY2019 | 56 | 83.9% | $109,500 | — | |
| 19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | 51 | 92.2% | $136,422 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 47%, Level II: 33%, Level III: 20% | |
| 20 | Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. | 51 | 94.1% | $154,400 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 100% | |
| 21 | Worley Group, Inc. | 47 | 78.7% | $119,683 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 22 | INFOSYS LIMITEDlast filed FY2013 | 46 | 95.7% | $73,242 | — | |
| 23 | L&T Technology Services Limited | 46 | 82.6% | $69,464 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 100% | |
| 24 | Yelp Inc. | 45 | 88.9% | $215,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 5%, Level II: 43%, Level III: 5%, Level IV: 48% | |
| 25 | Navistar, Inc. | 40 | 92.5% | $68,000 | — | |
| 26 | Stripe, Inc. | 38 | 100.0% | $214,365 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 3%, Level III: 20%, Level IV: 77% | |
| 27 | SIEMENS ENERGY, INC. | 37 | 94.6% | $112,882 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 80%, Level III: 20% | |
| 28 | Whirlpool Corporation | 35 | 68.6% | $128,648 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 4%, Level II: 33%, Level III: 17%, Level IV: 46% | |
| 29 | Coinbase, Inc. | 34 | 97.1% | $243,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 31%, Level III: 42%, Level IV: 27% | |
| 30 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 33 | 97.0% | $142,501 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 100% | |
| 31 | Meta Platforms, Inc | 33 | 100.0% | $249,235 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 22%, Level III: 19%, Level IV: 59% | |
| 32 | PURE STORAGE, INC. | 32 | 90.6% | $200,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 14%, Level II: 57%, Level III: 29% | |
| 33 | TechSource, Inc.last filed FY2018 | 32 | 71.9% | $117,000 | — | |
| 34 | AIRBNB, INC. | 30 | 100.0% | $207,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 5%, Level II: 41%, Level III: 32%, Level IV: 23% | |
| 35 | Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc.last filed FY2019 | 30 | 93.3% | $103,822 | — | |
| 36 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 28 | 92.9% | $123,624 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 13%, Level IV: 88% | |
| 37 | Netflix, Inc. | 28 | 92.9% | $288,870 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 38 | Pinterest, Inc. | 28 | 92.9% | $176,238 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 92%, Level III: 8% | |
| 39 | Schaeffler Group USA Inclast filed FY2018 | 28 | 96.4% | $75,000 | — | |
| 40 | LINKEDIN CORPORATION | 25 | 88.0% | $167,523 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% |
- Filings
- 430
- Certified
- 97.4%
- Median wage
- $164,574
- Filings
- 332
- Certified
- 97.6%
- Median wage
- $116,900
- Filings
- 294
- Certified
- 77.2%
- Median wage
- $79,789
- Filings
- 192
- Certified
- 97.4%
- Median wage
- $224,000
- Filings
- 185
- Certified
- 88.6%
- Median wage
- $196,634
- Filings
- 159
- Certified
- 89.9%
- Median wage
- $84,302
- Filings
- 139
- Certified
- 96.4%
- Median wage
- $197,300
- Filings
- 125
- Certified
- 88.8%
- Median wage
- $162,885
- Filings
- 111
- Certified
- 88.3%
- Median wage
- $183,714
- Filings
- 101
- Certified
- 89.1%
- Median wage
- $102,000
- Filings
- 96
- Certified
- 94.8%
- Median wage
- $245,500
- Filings
- 71
- Certified
- 93.0%
- Median wage
- $117,420
- Filings
- 71
- Certified
- 97.2%
- Median wage
- $126,500
- Filings
- 64
- Certified
- 79.7%
- Median wage
- $110,448
- Filings
- 61
- Certified
- 86.9%
- Median wage
- $96,750
- Filings
- 60
- Certified
- 86.7%
- Median wage
- $237,994
- Filings
- 57
- Certified
- 77.2%
- Median wage
- $130,603
- Filings
- 56
- Certified
- 83.9%
- Median wage
- $109,500
- Filings
- 51
- Certified
- 92.2%
- Median wage
- $136,422
- Filings
- 51
- Certified
- 94.1%
- Median wage
- $154,400
- Filings
- 47
- Certified
- 78.7%
- Median wage
- $119,683
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 95.7%
- Median wage
- $73,242
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 82.6%
- Median wage
- $69,464
- Filings
- 45
- Certified
- 88.9%
- Median wage
- $215,000
- Filings
- 40
- Certified
- 92.5%
- Median wage
- $68,000
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $214,365
- Filings
- 37
- Certified
- 94.6%
- Median wage
- $112,882
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 68.6%
- Median wage
- $128,648
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 97.1%
- Median wage
- $243,000
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 97.0%
- Median wage
- $142,501
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $249,235
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 90.6%
- Median wage
- $200,000
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 71.9%
- Median wage
- $117,000
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $207,000
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 93.3%
- Median wage
- $103,822
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 92.9%
- Median wage
- $123,624
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 92.9%
- Median wage
- $288,870
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 92.9%
- Median wage
- $176,238
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 96.4%
- Median wage
- $75,000
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 88.0%
- Median wage
- $167,523
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Architectural and Engineering Managers is sponsored
Other states with enough Architectural and Engineering Managers filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Understand the data
Definitions and methodology behind these H-1B figures.