Sponsor FinderSOC 15-1211DEUpdated September 2026
H-1B Sponsors for Computer Systems Analysts in Delaware
32 employers filed 3,053 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Computer Systems Analysts with worksites in Delaware between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 32all listed below
- Filings
- 3,05351% of all 5,951 for this role
- Certified
- 92.5%
- Median wage
- $65,000across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation in this state, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 3,053 of the 5,951 total shown on the Computer Systems Analysts occupation page (51%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-healthNot enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
This employer filed at least one WARN Act notice in the last 24 months — a state-mandated advance announcement of a planned mass layoff or closure. A notice is an announcement, not a completed layoff, and it is not evidence of any link between the employer’s H-1B filings and its workforce plans.
Showing 32 of 32 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Northstar Group, Inclast filed FY2017 | 414 | 97.3% | $61,000 | — | |
| 2 | Accenture LLP | 361 | 98.3% | $83,800 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 90%, Level IV: 10% | |
| 3 | VENTURESOFT GLOBAL INClast filed FY2014 | 346 | 97.4% | $62,733 | — | |
| 4 | DELASOFT, INC. | 268 | 98.9% | $60,550 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 50%, Level III: 50% | |
| 5 | OTIS IT, INClast filed FY2018 | 144 | 93.1% | $63,950 | — | |
| 6 | TEKSTROM INC. | 106 | 61.3% | $63,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 7 | VENSOFT SOLUTIONS, INC.last filed FY2018 | 105 | 96.2% | $65,000 | — | |
| 8 | INFOSYS LIMITED | 102 | 98.0% | $93,206 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 13%, Level III: 75%, Level IV: 13% | |
| 9 | Vensoft, Inc.last filed FY2014 | 96 | 93.8% | $62,000 | — | |
| 10 | WIPRO LIMITED | 83 | 90.4% | $72,862 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 67%, Level III: 33% | |
| 11 | HALLMARK GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INClast filed FY2016 | 80 | 73.8% | $63,000 | — | |
| 12 | Mphasis Corporationlast filed FY2018 | 76 | 100.0% | $72,259 | — | |
| 13 | STREAMLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INClast filed FY2018 | 67 | 86.6% | $65,000 | — | |
| 14 | TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED | 64 | 100.0% | $74,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 93%, Level III: 7% | |
| 15 | Deloitte Consulting LLPlast filed FY2023 | 63 | 95.2% | $90,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 16 | CAPGEMINI AMERICA INClast filed FY2018 | 57 | 96.5% | $79,200 | — | |
| 17 | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 57 | 94.7% | $85,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 40%, Level III: 20%, Level IV: 40% | |
| 18 | QUALITREE, INC.last filed FY2017 | 53 | 66.0% | $62,000 | — | |
| 19 | COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS US CORPlast filed FY2018 | 46 | 89.1% | $47,590 | — | |
| 20 | COMPUNNEL SOFTWARE GROUP, INC | 46 | 100.0% | $65,090 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 80%, Level III: 20% | |
| 21 | HCL AMERICA INClast filed FY2018 | 39 | 100.0% | $72,675 | — | |
| 22 | IBM Corporation | 39 | 79.5% | $92,856 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 83%, Level IV: 17% | |
| 23 | GB Tech, Inc. | 38 | 100.0% | $67,400 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 90%, Level II: 10% | |
| 24 | IMPLIFY INClast filed FY2015 | 38 | 89.5% | $61,540 | — | |
| 25 | SBM GROUP, INC.last filed FY2017 | 38 | 89.5% | $62,648 | — | |
| 26 | Stiaos Technologies last filed FY2018 | 38 | 52.6% | $56,930 | — | |
| 27 | V-Soft Consulting Group, INClast filed FY2017 | 38 | 55.3% | $63,000 | — | |
| 28 | IBM India Private Limitedlast filed FY2018 | 36 | 94.4% | $80,148 | — | |
| 29 | Tech Mahindra (Americas) Inc. | 33 | 97.0% | $79,165 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 30 | RELIABLE SOFTWARE RESOURCES | 32 | 100.0% | $62,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 31 | Barclays Bank Delaware last filed FY2017 | 25 | 76.0% | $99,000 | — | |
| 32 | Tek Tree LLClast filed FY2015 | 25 | 64.0% | $60,000 | — |
- Filings
- 414
- Certified
- 97.3%
- Median wage
- $61,000
- Filings
- 361
- Certified
- 98.3%
- Median wage
- $83,800
- Filings
- 346
- Certified
- 97.4%
- Median wage
- $62,733
- Filings
- 268
- Certified
- 98.9%
- Median wage
- $60,550
- Filings
- 144
- Certified
- 93.1%
- Median wage
- $63,950
- Filings
- 106
- Certified
- 61.3%
- Median wage
- $63,000
- Filings
- 105
- Certified
- 96.2%
- Median wage
- $65,000
- Filings
- 102
- Certified
- 98.0%
- Median wage
- $93,206
- Filings
- 96
- Certified
- 93.8%
- Median wage
- $62,000
- Filings
- 83
- Certified
- 90.4%
- Median wage
- $72,862
- Filings
- 80
- Certified
- 73.8%
- Median wage
- $63,000
- Filings
- 76
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $72,259
- Filings
- 67
- Certified
- 86.6%
- Median wage
- $65,000
- Filings
- 64
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $74,500
- Filings
- 63
- Certified
- 95.2%
- Median wage
- $90,000
- Filings
- 57
- Certified
- 96.5%
- Median wage
- $79,200
- Filings
- 57
- Certified
- 94.7%
- Median wage
- $85,000
- Filings
- 53
- Certified
- 66.0%
- Median wage
- $62,000
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 89.1%
- Median wage
- $47,590
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $65,090
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $72,675
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 79.5%
- Median wage
- $92,856
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $67,400
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 89.5%
- Median wage
- $61,540
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 89.5%
- Median wage
- $62,648
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 52.6%
- Median wage
- $56,930
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 55.3%
- Median wage
- $63,000
- Filings
- 36
- Certified
- 94.4%
- Median wage
- $80,148
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 97.0%
- Median wage
- $79,165
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $62,000
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 76.0%
- Median wage
- $99,000
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 64.0%
- Median wage
- $60,000
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Computer Systems Analysts is sponsored
Other states with enough Computer Systems Analysts filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Other occupations sponsored in Delaware
Roles with a publishable sponsor breakdown in this state.
Understand the data
Definitions and methodology behind these H-1B figures.