H-1B Sponsors for Lawyers in New York
40 employers filed 3,533 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Lawyers with worksites in New York between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 40all listed below
- Filings
- 3,53337% of all 9,433 for this role
- Certified
- 84.7%
- Median wage
- $225,000across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation in this state, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 3,533 of the 9,433 total shown on the Lawyers occupation page (37%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Showing 40 of 40 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 343 | 94.8% | $225,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 1%, Level II: 65%, Level III: 28%, Level IV: 6% | |
| 2 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 339 | 98.2% | $225,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 1%, Level II: 41%, Level III: 48%, Level IV: 10% | |
| 3 | Shearman & Sterling LLPlast filed FY2019 | 266 | 58.6% | $180,000 | — | |
| 4 | White & Case LLP | 253 | 70.8% | $235,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 18%, Level II: 15%, Level III: 24%, Level IV: 44% | |
| 5 | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | 219 | 70.8% | $185,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 44%, Level II: 12%, Level III: 32%, Level IV: 12% | |
| 6 | Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP | 190 | 92.6% | $225,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 14%, Level II: 83%, Level III: 1%, Level IV: 2% | |
| 7 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 160 | 100.0% | $260,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 13%, Level II: 74%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 1% | |
| 8 | Sidley Austin (US) LLP | 152 | 82.9% | $227,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 21%, Level III: 24%, Level IV: 22% | |
| 9 | DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP | 120 | 94.2% | $225,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 40%, Level III: 52%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 10 | Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP | 100 | 80.0% | $200,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 13%, Level II: 30%, Level III: 54%, Level IV: 4% | |
| 11 | FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & JACOBSON LLP | 96 | 77.1% | $250,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 11%, Level II: 20%, Level III: 49%, Level IV: 20% | |
| 12 | CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP | 87 | 95.4% | $160,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 88%, Level II: 12% | |
| 13 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | 87 | 71.3% | $235,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 19%, Level II: 15%, Level III: 67% | |
| 14 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | 76 | 82.9% | $302,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 49%, Level III: 39%, Level IV: 13% | |
| 15 | Kirkland & Ellis LLP | 74 | 95.9% | $310,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 13%, Level II: 15%, Level III: 17%, Level IV: 54% | |
| 16 | Linklaters LLP | 68 | 88.2% | $260,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 7%, Level II: 7%, Level III: 74%, Level IV: 12% | |
| 17 | CURTIS MALLET PREVOST COLT & MOSLE LLP | 60 | 86.7% | $170,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 67%, Level II: 33% | |
| 18 | Morrison & Foerster LLP | 55 | 69.1% | $150,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 19 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | 55 | 90.9% | $225,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 21%, Level II: 31%, Level III: 45%, Level IV: 3% | |
| 20 | SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP | 50 | 92.0% | $225,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 4%, Level II: 96% | |
| 21 | Mayer Brown LLP | 48 | 91.7% | $220,265 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 16%, Level II: 16%, Level III: 16%, Level IV: 52% | |
| 22 | Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan | 46 | 91.3% | $210,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 88%, Level IV: 13% | |
| 23 | Ropes & Gray LLP | 44 | 88.6% | $210,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 23%, Level III: 77% | |
| 24 | Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz | 43 | 90.7% | $215,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 42%, Level II: 25%, Level III: 33% | |
| 25 | Covington & Burling LLP | 40 | 85.0% | $225,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 18%, Level II: 24%, Level III: 47%, Level IV: 12% | |
| 26 | PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPlast filed FY2014 | 39 | 100.0% | $59,384 | — | |
| 27 | Allen Overy Shearman Sterling US LLP | 38 | 84.2% | $260,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 18%, Level II: 29%, Level III: 47%, Level IV: 5% | |
| 28 | Allen & Overy LLP | 37 | 81.1% | $210,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 29 | Paul Hastings LLP | 37 | 78.4% | $160,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 40%, Level II: 20%, Level IV: 40% | |
| 30 | Clifford Chance US LLP | 36 | 100.0% | $212,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 28%, Level III: 50%, Level IV: 22% | |
| 31 | O'Melveny & Myers LLP | 34 | 55.9% | $230,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 50%, Level IV: 50% | |
| 32 | King & Spalding LLP | 29 | 79.3% | $155,979 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 20%, Level II: 60%, Level IV: 20% | |
| 33 | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | 28 | 89.3% | $227,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 56%, Level III: 33%, Level IV: 11% | |
| 34 | Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP | 27 | 81.5% | $265,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 57%, Level III: 43% | |
| 35 | Baker & McKenzie LLP | 27 | 77.8% | $225,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 25%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 63% | |
| 36 | DLA Piper LLP (US) | 27 | 74.1% | $200,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 20%, Level II: 50%, Level III: 10%, Level IV: 20% | |
| 37 | MILBANK LLP | 27 | 100.0% | $365,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 63%, Level IV: 37% | |
| 38 | Proskauer Rose LLP | 26 | 88.5% | $235,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 73%, Level II: 9%, Level IV: 18% | |
| 39 | Schulte Roth & Zabel LLPlast filed FY2018 | 25 | 100.0% | $230,000 | — | |
| 40 | Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | 25 | 88.0% | $230,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 73%, Level II: 18%, Level III: 9% |
- Filings
- 343
- Certified
- 94.8%
- Median wage
- $225,000
- Filings
- 339
- Certified
- 98.2%
- Median wage
- $225,000
- Filings
- 266
- Certified
- 58.6%
- Median wage
- $180,000
- Filings
- 253
- Certified
- 70.8%
- Median wage
- $235,000
- Filings
- 219
- Certified
- 70.8%
- Median wage
- $185,000
- Filings
- 190
- Certified
- 92.6%
- Median wage
- $225,000
- Filings
- 160
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $260,000
- Filings
- 152
- Certified
- 82.9%
- Median wage
- $227,500
- Filings
- 120
- Certified
- 94.2%
- Median wage
- $225,000
- Filings
- 100
- Certified
- 80.0%
- Median wage
- $200,000
- Filings
- 96
- Certified
- 77.1%
- Median wage
- $250,000
- Filings
- 87
- Certified
- 95.4%
- Median wage
- $160,000
- Filings
- 87
- Certified
- 71.3%
- Median wage
- $235,000
- Filings
- 76
- Certified
- 82.9%
- Median wage
- $302,500
- Filings
- 74
- Certified
- 95.9%
- Median wage
- $310,000
- Filings
- 68
- Certified
- 88.2%
- Median wage
- $260,000
- Filings
- 60
- Certified
- 86.7%
- Median wage
- $170,000
- Filings
- 55
- Certified
- 69.1%
- Median wage
- $150,000
- Filings
- 55
- Certified
- 90.9%
- Median wage
- $225,000
- Filings
- 50
- Certified
- 92.0%
- Median wage
- $225,000
- Filings
- 48
- Certified
- 91.7%
- Median wage
- $220,265
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 91.3%
- Median wage
- $210,000
- Filings
- 44
- Certified
- 88.6%
- Median wage
- $210,000
- Filings
- 43
- Certified
- 90.7%
- Median wage
- $215,000
- Filings
- 40
- Certified
- 85.0%
- Median wage
- $225,000
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $59,384
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 84.2%
- Median wage
- $260,000
- Filings
- 37
- Certified
- 81.1%
- Median wage
- $210,000
- Filings
- 37
- Certified
- 78.4%
- Median wage
- $160,000
- Filings
- 36
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $212,500
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 55.9%
- Median wage
- $230,000
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 79.3%
- Median wage
- $155,979
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 89.3%
- Median wage
- $227,500
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 81.5%
- Median wage
- $265,000
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 77.8%
- Median wage
- $225,000
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 74.1%
- Median wage
- $200,000
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $365,000
- Filings
- 26
- Certified
- 88.5%
- Median wage
- $235,000
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $230,000
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 88.0%
- Median wage
- $230,000
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Lawyers is sponsored
Other states with enough Lawyers filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Other occupations sponsored in New York
Roles with a publishable sponsor breakdown in this state.