Sponsor FinderSOC 15-1253VAUpdated September 2026
H-1B Sponsors for Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers in Virginia
35 employers filed 2,786 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers with worksites in Virginia between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 35all listed below
- Filings
- 2,78628% of all 9,959 for this role
- Certified
- 91.0%
- Median wage
- $78,915across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation in this state, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 2,786 of the 9,959 total shown on the Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers occupation page (28%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Derived from DOL certification and denial outcomes and recent filing volume. It describes DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, job quality, or an endorsement. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-healthNot enough recent filings to score this sponsor for this role and location — fewer than 25 filings, or none in the last 5 fiscal years. Absence of a score is not a negative signal. Full methodology at /methodology#sponsor-health
This employer filed at least one WARN Act notice in the last 24 months — a state-mandated advance announcement of a planned mass layoff or closure. A notice is an announcement, not a completed layoff, and it is not evidence of any link between the employer’s H-1B filings and its workforce plans.
Showing 35 of 35 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INFOSYS LIMITED | 416 | 99.8% | $71,583 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 2 | MicroStrategy, Inc. | 249 | 66.3% | $70,803 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 29%, Level III: 71% | |
| 3 | Capital One Services, LLC | 241 | 86.7% | $90,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 50%, Level IV: 50% | |
| 4 | COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS US CORP | 201 | 100.0% | $106,454 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 44%, Level III: 49%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 5 | Accenture LLP | 176 | 98.9% | $76,800 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 33%, Level III: 56%, Level IV: 11% | |
| 6 | UST GLOBAL INC | 137 | 97.1% | $74,235 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 7 | ICONMA LLClast filed FY2019 | 97 | 100.0% | $78,915 | — | |
| 8 | REI Systems Inc. | 93 | 93.5% | $82,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 8%, Level II: 48%, Level III: 44% | |
| 9 | CAPGEMINI AMERICA INC | 71 | 95.8% | $75,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 26%, Level III: 68%, Level IV: 5% | |
| 10 | Hexaware Technologies, Inc. | 67 | 97.0% | $94,100 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 97%, Level III: 3% | |
| 11 | Synechron Inc. | 67 | 88.1% | $85,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 12 | Dell Marketing L.P.last filed FY2017 | 64 | 84.4% | $88,546 | — | |
| 13 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporationlast filed FY2023 | 64 | 42.2% | $75,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 14 | USM Business Systems Inc | 61 | 80.3% | $76,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 15 | TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED | 60 | 100.0% | $69,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 92%, Level III: 8% | |
| 16 | Micron Technology, Inc. | 55 | 81.8% | $89,049 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 75%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 13% | |
| 17 | SuccessFactors, Inc.last filed FY2018 | 46 | 100.0% | $81,104 | — | |
| 18 | HCL AMERICA INC | 44 | 100.0% | $82,056 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 38%, Level III: 62% | |
| 19 | IBM India Private Limitedlast filed FY2019 | 43 | 81.4% | $70,200 | — | |
| 20 | ANTHEM, INC.last filed FY2019 | 40 | 100.0% | $84,900 | — | |
| 21 | Vigna Solutions, Inc.last filed FY2017 | 40 | 95.0% | $69,056 | — | |
| 22 | APPLIED PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 38 | 92.1% | $83,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 23 | CGI Technologies and Solutions Inc. | 38 | 100.0% | $95,368 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 81%, Level III: 19% | |
| 24 | Elevance Health, Inc. | 38 | 100.0% | $119,730 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 18%, Level III: 32%, Level IV: 50% | |
| 25 | AMPCUS, Inc. | 36 | 97.2% | $78,900 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 67%, Level III: 33% | |
| 26 | Evolent Health LLC | 35 | 88.6% | $105,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 50%, Level IV: 50% | |
| 27 | Quality Matrix, Inc. | 34 | 79.4% | $72,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 28 | SYSTEM SOFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | 33 | 78.8% | $75,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 67% | |
| 29 | G-INFOTECH INClast filed FY2018 | 32 | 96.9% | $70,000 | — | |
| 30 | NTT DATA Services, LLC | 32 | 87.5% | $101,326 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 31 | ICloud Technologies Corp. | 30 | 100.0% | $82,075 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 32 | Syscom Services Web Technology, Inc.last filed FY2015 | 30 | 96.7% | $67,477 | — | |
| 33 | ANIRA SOLUTIONS INClast filed FY2019 | 27 | 100.0% | $84,000 | — | |
| 34 | Hanusoft Inc | 26 | 92.3% | $60,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 35 | iZeal, Inc. | 25 | 100.0% | $78,915 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 67% |
- Filings
- 416
- Certified
- 99.8%
- Median wage
- $71,583
- Filings
- 249
- Certified
- 66.3%
- Median wage
- $70,803
- Filings
- 241
- Certified
- 86.7%
- Median wage
- $90,000
- Filings
- 201
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $106,454
- Filings
- 176
- Certified
- 98.9%
- Median wage
- $76,800
- Filings
- 137
- Certified
- 97.1%
- Median wage
- $74,235
- Filings
- 97
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $78,915
- Filings
- 93
- Certified
- 93.5%
- Median wage
- $82,000
- Filings
- 71
- Certified
- 95.8%
- Median wage
- $75,500
- Filings
- 67
- Certified
- 97.0%
- Median wage
- $94,100
- Filings
- 67
- Certified
- 88.1%
- Median wage
- $85,000
- Filings
- 64
- Certified
- 84.4%
- Median wage
- $88,546
- Filings
- 64
- Certified
- 42.2%
- Median wage
- $75,000
- Filings
- 61
- Certified
- 80.3%
- Median wage
- $76,000
- Filings
- 60
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $69,000
- Filings
- 55
- Certified
- 81.8%
- Median wage
- $89,049
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $81,104
- Filings
- 44
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $82,056
- Filings
- 43
- Certified
- 81.4%
- Median wage
- $70,200
- Filings
- 40
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $84,900
- Filings
- 40
- Certified
- 95.0%
- Median wage
- $69,056
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 92.1%
- Median wage
- $83,000
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $95,368
- Filings
- 38
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $119,730
- Filings
- 36
- Certified
- 97.2%
- Median wage
- $78,900
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 88.6%
- Median wage
- $105,000
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 79.4%
- Median wage
- $72,500
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 78.8%
- Median wage
- $75,000
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 96.9%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 87.5%
- Median wage
- $101,326
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $82,075
- Filings
- 30
- Certified
- 96.7%
- Median wage
- $67,477
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $84,000
- Filings
- 26
- Certified
- 92.3%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $78,915
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers is sponsored
Other states with enough Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Other occupations sponsored in Virginia
Roles with a publishable sponsor breakdown in this state.
Understand the data
Definitions and methodology behind these H-1B figures.