H-1B Sponsors for Civil Engineers
242 employers filed 19,727 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Civil Engineers across the US between FY2010 and FY2026. The 50 largest are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 242top 50 listed
- Filings
- 19,72726% of all 76,696 for this role
- Certified
- 87.2%across those listed
- Median wage
- $77,500across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 19,727 of the 76,696 total shown on the Civil Engineers occupation page (26%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Top 50 sponsors, ranked
The 50 highest-volume of 242 employers that filed for this role here. Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
Showing 50 of 50 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AECOM Technical Services Inc | 756 | 82.1% | $76,128 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 43%, Level II: 33%, Level III: 18%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 2 | Engineering Technology Associates, Inc. | 695 | 94.7% | $60,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 50% | |
| 3 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | 622 | 67.5% | $62,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 46%, Level II: 23%, Level III: 31% | |
| 4 | GEOMETRIC AMERICAS INC.last filed FY2017 | 572 | 73.1% | $64,700 | — | |
| 5 | California Department of Transportation | 537 | 87.5% | $88,956 | — | |
| 6 | WSP USA Inc. | 516 | 90.9% | $86,736 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 32%, Level II: 37%, Level III: 21%, Level IV: 9% | |
| 7 | Microsoft Corporationlast filed FY2023 | 456 | 90.1% | $115,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 8 | Amazon Data Services, Inc | 426 | 99.3% | $137,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 46%, Level III: 15%, Level IV: 6% | |
| 9 | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 409 | 80.9% | $89,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 37%, Level II: 39%, Level III: 14%, Level IV: 9% | |
| 10 | HDR Engineering, Inc. | 393 | 92.9% | $80,600 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 48%, Level II: 3%, Level III: 33%, Level IV: 16% | |
| 11 | DPR Construction, A General Partnership | 337 | 78.3% | $84,219 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 19%, Level II: 52%, Level III: 21%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 12 | Detroit Engineered Products, Inc. | 302 | 93.4% | $65,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 38%, Level II: 50%, Level III: 13% | |
| 13 | Stantec Consulting Services Inc. | 281 | 89.0% | $82,014 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 48%, Level II: 35%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 4% | |
| 14 | Black & Veatch Corporation | 252 | 95.2% | $73,320 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 36%, Level II: 32%, Level IV: 33% | |
| 15 | Arcadis U.S., Inc. | 248 | 89.9% | $75,889 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 41%, Level III: 11%, Level IV: 15% | |
| 16 | Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc.last filed FY2019 | 235 | 88.9% | $77,244 | — | |
| 17 | CAPGEMINI AMERICA INC | 226 | 94.2% | $72,550 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 18 | DC Group, Inc. | 221 | 97.7% | $57,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 19 | optimal cae, inc.last filed FY2019 | 217 | 96.3% | $73,066 | — | |
| 20 | Michael Baker International, Inc. | 192 | 86.5% | $71,115 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 18%, Level II: 58%, Level III: 23% | |
| 21 | FEV North America, Inc. | 190 | 87.4% | $72,912 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 52%, Level II: 43%, Level III: 4% | |
| 22 | Turner Construction Company | 180 | 87.8% | $77,934 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 51%, Level II: 26%, Level III: 17%, Level IV: 6% | |
| 23 | RACAR INTL D/E LLC | 174 | 97.1% | $72,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 100% | |
| 24 | CH2M Hill Inc. | 172 | 75.6% | $77,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 56%, Level III: 22%, Level IV: 22% | |
| 25 | CORE TECH CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION | 166 | 97.0% | $60,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 43%, Level II: 32%, Level III: 16%, Level IV: 10% | |
| 26 | Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, LLC | 161 | 95.7% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 64%, Level II: 30%, Level III: 4%, Level IV: 2% | |
| 27 | Terracon Consultants, Inc. | 159 | 92.5% | $70,400 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 72%, Level II: 17%, Level III: 7%, Level IV: 4% | |
| 28 | CORE TECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION | 149 | 86.6% | $50,024 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 13%, Level II: 35%, Level III: 12%, Level IV: 40% | |
| 29 | T.Y. Lin International | 130 | 87.7% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 52%, Level II: 30%, Level III: 3%, Level IV: 15% | |
| 30 | CDM Smith Inc. | 126 | 77.8% | $81,827 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 4%, Level II: 50%, Level IV: 46% | |
| 31 | Kiewit Engineering Group Inc. | 118 | 99.2% | $99,817 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 54%, Level II: 23%, Level III: 8%, Level IV: 15% | |
| 32 | Walter P. Moore and Associates, Inc. | 118 | 98.3% | $72,654 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 42%, Level II: 49%, Level III: 2%, Level IV: 7% | |
| 33 | Arm, Inc. | 116 | 98.3% | $114,234 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 8%, Level II: 83%, Level III: 9% | |
| 34 | Thornton Tomasetti, Inc. | 115 | 80.9% | $90,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 24%, Level II: 58%, Level III: 19% | |
| 35 | STV Incorporated | 113 | 83.2% | $84,032 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 37%, Level II: 40%, Level III: 19%, Level IV: 4% | |
| 36 | Clayco, Inc. | 111 | 99.1% | $92,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 22%, Level II: 52%, Level III: 1%, Level IV: 25% | |
| 37 | Nan Inc. | 107 | 96.3% | $80,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 58%, Level II: 23%, Level III: 10%, Level IV: 9% | |
| 38 | EASi, LLClast filed FY2018 | 104 | 89.4% | $62,920 | — | |
| 39 | Gannett Fleming, Inc. | 103 | 94.2% | $78,852 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 52%, Level II: 17%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 17% | |
| 40 | Bechtel Infrastructure and Power Corporation | 101 | 89.1% | $81,528 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 10%, Level II: 40%, Level III: 20%, Level IV: 30% | |
| 41 | Arup US, Inc. | 100 | 62.0% | $77,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 38%, Level IV: 13% | |
| 42 | TechSource, Inc.last filed FY2018 | 98 | 74.5% | $85,610 | — | |
| 43 | Worley Group, Inc. | 97 | 79.4% | $94,494 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 23%, Level II: 31%, Level III: 15%, Level IV: 31% | |
| 44 | BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. | 95 | 97.9% | $92,559 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 35%, Level III: 10%, Level IV: 55% | |
| 45 | HNTB Corporation | 92 | 97.8% | $98,426 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 26%, Level III: 26%, Level IV: 48% | |
| 46 | Ericsson Inc.last filed FY2017 | 91 | 61.5% | $58,469 | — | |
| 47 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP | 91 | 87.9% | $73,222 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 57%, Level II: 43% | |
| 48 | InDepth Engineering Solutions, LLC | 90 | 83.3% | $70,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 50%, Level III: 50% | |
| 49 | Webcor Construction, LP | 90 | 73.3% | $84,240 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 44%, Level II: 44%, Level III: 11% | |
| 50 | Automotive Robotics Incorporated | 83 | 88.0% | $61,173 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 67%, Level II: 33% |
- Filings
- 756
- Certified
- 82.1%
- Median wage
- $76,128
- Filings
- 695
- Certified
- 94.7%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Filings
- 622
- Certified
- 67.5%
- Median wage
- $62,000
- Filings
- 572
- Certified
- 73.1%
- Median wage
- $64,700
- Filings
- 537
- Certified
- 87.5%
- Median wage
- $88,956
- Filings
- 516
- Certified
- 90.9%
- Median wage
- $86,736
- Filings
- 456
- Certified
- 90.1%
- Median wage
- $115,000
- Filings
- 426
- Certified
- 99.3%
- Median wage
- $137,000
- Filings
- 409
- Certified
- 80.9%
- Median wage
- $89,000
- Filings
- 393
- Certified
- 92.9%
- Median wage
- $80,600
- Filings
- 337
- Certified
- 78.3%
- Median wage
- $84,219
- Filings
- 302
- Certified
- 93.4%
- Median wage
- $65,000
- Filings
- 281
- Certified
- 89.0%
- Median wage
- $82,014
- Filings
- 252
- Certified
- 95.2%
- Median wage
- $73,320
- Filings
- 248
- Certified
- 89.9%
- Median wage
- $75,889
- Filings
- 235
- Certified
- 88.9%
- Median wage
- $77,244
- Filings
- 226
- Certified
- 94.2%
- Median wage
- $72,550
- Filings
- 221
- Certified
- 97.7%
- Median wage
- $57,000
- Filings
- 217
- Certified
- 96.3%
- Median wage
- $73,066
- Filings
- 192
- Certified
- 86.5%
- Median wage
- $71,115
- Filings
- 190
- Certified
- 87.4%
- Median wage
- $72,912
- Filings
- 180
- Certified
- 87.8%
- Median wage
- $77,934
- Filings
- 174
- Certified
- 97.1%
- Median wage
- $72,000
- Filings
- 172
- Certified
- 75.6%
- Median wage
- $77,500
- Filings
- 166
- Certified
- 97.0%
- Median wage
- $60,000
- Filings
- 161
- Certified
- 95.7%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 159
- Certified
- 92.5%
- Median wage
- $70,400
- Filings
- 149
- Certified
- 86.6%
- Median wage
- $50,024
- Filings
- 130
- Certified
- 87.7%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 126
- Certified
- 77.8%
- Median wage
- $81,827
- Filings
- 118
- Certified
- 99.2%
- Median wage
- $99,817
- Filings
- 118
- Certified
- 98.3%
- Median wage
- $72,654
- Filings
- 116
- Certified
- 98.3%
- Median wage
- $114,234
- Filings
- 115
- Certified
- 80.9%
- Median wage
- $90,000
- Filings
- 113
- Certified
- 83.2%
- Median wage
- $84,032
- Filings
- 111
- Certified
- 99.1%
- Median wage
- $92,000
- Filings
- 107
- Certified
- 96.3%
- Median wage
- $80,000
- Filings
- 104
- Certified
- 89.4%
- Median wage
- $62,920
- Filings
- 103
- Certified
- 94.2%
- Median wage
- $78,852
- Filings
- 101
- Certified
- 89.1%
- Median wage
- $81,528
- Filings
- 100
- Certified
- 62.0%
- Median wage
- $77,000
- Filings
- 98
- Certified
- 74.5%
- Median wage
- $85,610
- Filings
- 97
- Certified
- 79.4%
- Median wage
- $94,494
- Filings
- 95
- Certified
- 97.9%
- Median wage
- $92,559
- Filings
- 92
- Certified
- 97.8%
- Median wage
- $98,426
- Filings
- 91
- Certified
- 61.5%
- Median wage
- $58,469
- Filings
- 91
- Certified
- 87.9%
- Median wage
- $73,222
- Filings
- 90
- Certified
- 83.3%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 90
- Certified
- 73.3%
- Median wage
- $84,240
- Filings
- 83
- Certified
- 88.0%
- Median wage
- $61,173
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Civil Engineers is sponsored
Other states with enough Civil Engineers filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.