H-1B Sponsors for Civil Engineers in Texas
46 employers filed 2,534 H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Civil Engineers with worksites in Texas between FY2010 and FY2026. All are ranked below, with DOL certification outcomes and a sponsor-health signal.
- Employers
- 46all listed below
- Filings
- 2,53424% of all 10,699 for this role
- Certified
- 82.6%
- Median wage
- $77,635across the sponsors listed
How this total is counted: filings from employers with at least 25 for this occupation in this state, a resolved employer and a recorded worksite state. That is 2,534 of the 10,699 total shown on the Civil Engineers occupation page (24%); the remainder is the long tail of employers below the publishing threshold.
How to read this
- Does an H-1B filing mean a visa was granted?
- No. A Labor Condition Application is the wage-and-worksite filing an employer makes before petitioning. Many certified LCAs never become petitions, and an LCA is not a visa. What an LCA is.
- Is a certified filing the same as USCIS approval?
- No. Certification is a Department of Labor outcome. The I-129 petition is decided separately by USCIS and is not in this dataset. How certification rate works.
- Does a withdrawn filing count against a sponsor?
- No. A withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped, so it is not a compliance signal and is not counted against a sponsor in the sponsor-health score. How sponsor health is calculated.
- Is the wage shown what an employee takes home?
- No. Offered and prevailing wages are the figures on the filing, before tax, bonus or equity, and they describe the role rather than an individual paycheck. How the prevailing wage works.
- Is the most recent fiscal year complete?
- Not necessarily. The Department of Labor releases disclosure data quarterly, so counts for the latest fiscal years can still rise in a later release.
- Why are some occupations or states missing?
- Combinations backed by fewer than 25 filings, or fewer than 3 distinct employers, are not published at all. Small cells are omitted entirely rather than shown with unreliable numbers.
Sponsors, ranked
Filter and sort instantly — everything below is already on the page, so nothing reloads. Your view is shareable: the URL updates as you filter.
This employer filed at least one WARN Act notice in the last 24 months — a state-mandated advance announcement of a planned mass layoff or closure. A notice is an announcement, not a completed layoff, and it is not evidence of any link between the employer’s H-1B filings and its workforce plans.
Showing 46 of 46 sponsors · all filings FY2010–FY2026.
| # | Wage levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | 227 | 67.4% | $62,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 67%, Level II: 33% | |
| 2 | Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc.last filed FY2019 | 221 | 90.0% | $76,644 | — | |
| 3 | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 113 | 74.3% | $93,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 40%, Level III: 19%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 4 | TechSource, Inc.last filed FY2018 | 88 | 73.9% | $88,110 | — | |
| 5 | AECOM Technical Services Inc | 86 | 80.2% | $77,635 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 43%, Level II: 35%, Level III: 15%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 6 | HDR Engineering, Inc. | 79 | 97.5% | $83,221 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 48%, Level III: 36%, Level IV: 16% | |
| 7 | Microsoft Corporationlast filed FY2019 | 67 | 89.6% | $109,637 | — | |
| 8 | Ericsson Inc.last filed FY2017 | 65 | 63.1% | $55,837 | — | |
| 9 | GEOMETRIC AMERICAS INC.last filed FY2017 | 64 | 87.5% | $61,100 | — | |
| 10 | Walter P. Moore and Associates, Inc. | 64 | 100.0% | $72,437 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 42%, Level IV: 8% | |
| 11 | Texas A&M Transportation Institute | 62 | 61.3% | $59,796 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 67% | |
| 12 | WSP USA Inc. | 61 | 91.8% | $91,686 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 26%, Level II: 47%, Level III: 17%, Level IV: 11% | |
| 13 | Worley Group, Inc. | 60 | 78.3% | $101,787 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 29%, Level II: 29%, Level IV: 43% | |
| 14 | CB&I LLC | 59 | 78.0% | $133,765 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level IV: 100% | |
| 15 | Arm, Inc. | 58 | 100.0% | $110,334 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 87%, Level III: 13% | |
| 16 | AtkinsRealis USA Inc. | 57 | 49.1% | $81,619 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 33%, Level III: 17% | |
| 17 | Testengeer, Inc. | 54 | 88.9% | $62,504 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 100% | |
| 18 | Amazon Data Services, Inc | 52 | 100.0% | $140,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 13%, Level II: 58%, Level III: 13%, Level IV: 15% | |
| 19 | AMEC Foster Wheeler USA Corporationlast filed FY2017 | 49 | 87.8% | $106,080 | — | |
| 20 | Terracon Consultants, Inc. | 48 | 89.6% | $72,075 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 71%, Level II: 19%, Level III: 10% | |
| 21 | Fluor Enterprises, Inc. | 46 | 80.4% | $95,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 38%, Level II: 38%, Level IV: 24% | |
| 22 | Stantec Consulting Services Inc. | 46 | 87.0% | $84,011 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 38%, Level II: 41%, Level III: 21% | |
| 23 | Professional Service Industries, Inc. | 44 | 86.4% | $65,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 75%, Level II: 25% | |
| 24 | Black & Veatch Corporation | 41 | 97.6% | $66,477 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 46%, Level II: 8%, Level IV: 46% | |
| 25 | DPR Construction, A General Partnership | 41 | 80.5% | $85,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 25%, Level II: 46%, Level III: 18%, Level IV: 11% | |
| 26 | Webber, LLC | 40 | 100.0% | $71,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 76%, Level II: 24% | |
| 27 | Amani Engineering, Inc. | 39 | 92.3% | $66,477 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 28 | EDAG, Inc. last filed FY2016 | 39 | 61.5% | $91,520 | — | |
| 29 | Weatherford International, LLClast filed FY2018 | 39 | 71.8% | $80,400 | — | |
| 30 | AG&E Associates, PLLC | 35 | 94.3% | $82,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 18%, Level II: 53%, Level III: 29% | |
| 31 | National Oilwell Varco, L.P. | 35 | 71.4% | $65,445 | — | |
| 32 | RECARO Aircraft Seating Americas LLC | 35 | 94.3% | $68,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 100% | |
| 33 | Chevron Corporation | 34 | 85.3% | $113,700 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level II: 25%, Level IV: 75% | |
| 34 | Industrial Flow Solutions Operating LLClast filed FY2017 | 33 | 100.0% | $70,000 | — | |
| 35 | M-I LLClast filed FY2019 | 33 | 66.7% | $66,000 | — | |
| 36 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 32 | 90.6% | $109,978 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level III: 50%, Level IV: 50% | |
| 37 | ISANI CONSULTANTS, L.P. | 32 | 93.8% | $76,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 36%, Level II: 18%, Level III: 27%, Level IV: 18% | |
| 38 | Michael Baker International, Inc. | 32 | 84.4% | $68,006 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 8%, Level II: 83%, Level III: 8% | |
| 39 | Baker Hughes Companylast filed FY2017 | 31 | 77.4% | $74,900 | — | |
| 40 | Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.last filed FY2019 | 31 | 83.9% | $65,374 | — | |
| 41 | McDermott, Inc. | 29 | 69.0% | $93,500 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 40%, Level III: 20%, Level IV: 40% | |
| 42 | Arcadis U.S., Inc. | 28 | 89.3% | $82,014 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 33%, Level II: 22%, Level IV: 44% | |
| 43 | INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA, INC. | 27 | 92.6% | $70,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 17%, Level II: 33%, Level III: 50% | |
| 44 | RRC Power and Energy, LLC | 27 | 96.3% | $67,933 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 68%, Level II: 21%, Level III: 11% | |
| 45 | CDM Smith Inc. | 26 | 84.6% | $82,076 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 7%, Level II: 50%, Level IV: 43% | |
| 46 | FMC Technologies, Inc. | 25 | 84.0% | $93,000 | Prevailing-wage level mix — Level I: 50%, Level II: 50% |
- Filings
- 227
- Certified
- 67.4%
- Median wage
- $62,000
- Filings
- 221
- Certified
- 90.0%
- Median wage
- $76,644
- Filings
- 113
- Certified
- 74.3%
- Median wage
- $93,000
- Filings
- 88
- Certified
- 73.9%
- Median wage
- $88,110
- Filings
- 86
- Certified
- 80.2%
- Median wage
- $77,635
- Filings
- 79
- Certified
- 97.5%
- Median wage
- $83,221
- Filings
- 67
- Certified
- 89.6%
- Median wage
- $109,637
- Filings
- 65
- Certified
- 63.1%
- Median wage
- $55,837
- Filings
- 64
- Certified
- 87.5%
- Median wage
- $61,100
- Filings
- 64
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $72,437
- Filings
- 62
- Certified
- 61.3%
- Median wage
- $59,796
- Filings
- 61
- Certified
- 91.8%
- Median wage
- $91,686
- Filings
- 60
- Certified
- 78.3%
- Median wage
- $101,787
- Filings
- 59
- Certified
- 78.0%
- Median wage
- $133,765
- Filings
- 58
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $110,334
- Filings
- 57
- Certified
- 49.1%
- Median wage
- $81,619
- Filings
- 54
- Certified
- 88.9%
- Median wage
- $62,504
- Filings
- 52
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $140,000
- Filings
- 49
- Certified
- 87.8%
- Median wage
- $106,080
- Filings
- 48
- Certified
- 89.6%
- Median wage
- $72,075
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 80.4%
- Median wage
- $95,000
- Filings
- 46
- Certified
- 87.0%
- Median wage
- $84,011
- Filings
- 44
- Certified
- 86.4%
- Median wage
- $65,000
- Filings
- 41
- Certified
- 97.6%
- Median wage
- $66,477
- Filings
- 41
- Certified
- 80.5%
- Median wage
- $85,000
- Filings
- 40
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $71,000
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 92.3%
- Median wage
- $66,477
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 61.5%
- Median wage
- $91,520
- Filings
- 39
- Certified
- 71.8%
- Median wage
- $80,400
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 94.3%
- Median wage
- $82,500
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 71.4%
- Median wage
- $65,445
- Filings
- 35
- Certified
- 94.3%
- Median wage
- $68,500
- Filings
- 34
- Certified
- 85.3%
- Median wage
- $113,700
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 100.0%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 33
- Certified
- 66.7%
- Median wage
- $66,000
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 90.6%
- Median wage
- $109,978
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 93.8%
- Median wage
- $76,500
- Filings
- 32
- Certified
- 84.4%
- Median wage
- $68,006
- Filings
- 31
- Certified
- 77.4%
- Median wage
- $74,900
- Filings
- 31
- Certified
- 83.9%
- Median wage
- $65,374
- Filings
- 29
- Certified
- 69.0%
- Median wage
- $93,500
- Filings
- 28
- Certified
- 89.3%
- Median wage
- $82,014
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 92.6%
- Median wage
- $70,000
- Filings
- 27
- Certified
- 96.3%
- Median wage
- $67,933
- Filings
- 26
- Certified
- 84.6%
- Median wage
- $82,076
- Filings
- 25
- Certified
- 84.0%
- Median wage
- $93,000
How the sponsor-health signal is calculated
The badge blends each sponsor’s DOL certification rate (weighted toward the last five fiscal years), its denial rate, and its recent filing volume. Withdrawn filings are not counted against a sponsor, because a withdrawal usually means the role was filled or dropped. Sponsors with too few or too old filings show “Limited data” rather than a score. It reflects DOL paperwork outcomes only — not USCIS approval, pay quality, or an endorsement. Full methodology.
Where else Civil Engineers is sponsored
Other states with enough Civil Engineers filings to publish a sponsor breakdown.
Other occupations sponsored in Texas
Roles with a publishable sponsor breakdown in this state.